The Arizona Sentinel

March 28, 2015

Nevada AB 408 Natural Resource Bill/ Is the Dirt in your back yard really yours??

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: — thearizonasentinel @ 1:33 pm

SUPPORT NEVADA BILL AB408 – THE BILL IS THE #1 MOST PUBLICLY SUPPORTED BILL IN THE NEVADA LEGISlATURE, BUT THE OPPOSITION IS INCREASING. My Friends, It is simple, the land belongs to the people. The link to AB 408 is below. The natural resources of America are being stolen from the people and claimed by the federal government. Everything we eat, wear, live in, use and so on comes from the earth. If we lose access to the land and natural resources we become beggars to those who control access. Without doubt this is the greatest immediate threat to the individual person and people as a whole. More lives, liberties and property can be taken under this threat than any other we see. The Nevadan’s Resource Rights Bill (NRR) AB408 has only had a number for five days and it is already the most publicly supported bill in the session, out of nearly a thousand. However, we are starting to see opposition to the bill mount by those that want the federal government to own and control all the land and resources. We need to make sure we are louder than them. If you have not already done it, please go to the link below and show your support for the bill. If you can come to Carson City to support the bill on March 31st, please clink on that link and let us know. You do NOT need to be a Nevada resident to show your support for this bill. In fact, legislators pay special attention to bills that are receiving national support simply because those bills are likely to end up on national news. We sincerely hope this bill will be picked up by other states, your state, so that you will be protected as well. Here are the links Go this link to show support for the bill, https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Opinions/78th2015/A/ select bill number AB408, select FOR, and put in your name and address. This is the official website for the Nevada Legislature and legislators use it to determine public support. If you are a citizen of Nevada it is a bonus, but it does not matter where you live, we need the support of all the States around us including those out east. Please click on the link and fill in the form to show your support for the bill. Show up in Carson City, March 31st at 9 am. Over 15 Nevada State Legislators sponsored the NRR bill and have asked that we fill the house during the committee hearing. We must show up in person and make our presence known. If we fill the house, the committee will pass it and the talk of the 2015 session will be the NRR bill (AB408). With enough of your physical support in Carson City the committee will pass the NRR bill and it will have a substantial chance of becoming Nevada law soon after. We have many rooms booked and buses chartered from Las Vegas and Phoenix. If you plan on coming to Carson City click on this link to receive further information. https://docs.google.com/a/valetfleet.com/forms/d/1PqDPvH7FKhsYrgmZlBRSYrpW62kKv4yvpikA4Qwun1I/viewform Send this email to your family and friends and ask them to support as well. Thank you, Ammon Bundy Nevadans’ Resource Rights Bill (NRR) – AB408 “It is simple, the land belongs to the people” AN ACT relating to the right of an individual to beneficially use the natural resources on public land, the right of private property owners to beneficially use the natural recourses on deeded property, the right of the public to access public land; prohibiting the Federal Government from owning or regulating certain lands or other natural resource including minerals and the right to use public waters without proper cession from the state as set forth in the U.S. Constitution; requiring the State Land Registrar to adopt regulations that provide for the appropriation and registration of grazing, logging, mineral development or other beneficial use rights on public lands; requiring the State Land Registrar to sell permits for grazing, logging, mineral development or other beneficial uses on public lands for which such rights are not registered and appropriated; requiring the Board of County Commissioners of each county to impose a tax on unit product sold from the beneficial use of public lands or other natural resource including minerals; providing for the administration and defense of the peoples right to the land and resources. Link to the NRR AB408, http://1drv.ms/1xyphWe Forward this email This email was sent to panderson39@cox.net by cbundyemails@gmail.com | Update Profile/Email Address | Rapid removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy. Bundy Ranch | 7175 Gold Butte Rd | Bunkerville | NV | 89007

And there is this::

From: Carol Bundy <cbundyemails@gmail.com>
To: arizonasentinel <arizonasentinel@aol.com>
Sent: Fri, Mar 27, 2015 3:39 pm
Subject: Is the dirt in you back yard really yours? Support Bill AB408


Friends,

While speaking with people from Las Vegas about the Nevadan’s Resource Rights Bill AB408 it was explained to me that t he BLM is imposing fines and forced recourse upon private property owners for building pools in their own backyards.
 
The BLM claims that the soil that is being removed from private property belongs to them, and that the home owners must get permission from and pay them to remove it. Just to be clear this is the dirt on private property. The feds say they own the minerals, including dirt as a mineral. If we are not purchasing the soil when we buy private property then what are were paying for with our hard earned money? If not the land, then what?

This is just one example of how the Federal Government is seeking to take the resources from the people for themselves. Land and resources = power. This power is too important for the people to lose. What will stop them from claiming that we cannot harvest a garden out of our own backyards, without paying them.
We must stand against this!

PLEASE SUPPORT BILL AB408- THIS BILL ENFORCES THAT THE RESOURCES BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE

The resources committee hearing details are below,
we need everyone we can get to come to one of the locations during the hearing. It does not matter if you live in Nevada or not. This will set a precedence and other states will follow. Please take time off and make this a priority.

Our Rally will begin at 12 Noon, in the Court Yard between the Capitol, Court and Assembly Buildings.
See the map below.

If you cannot make it to Carson City you can watch and learn from Elko and Las Vegas

Meeting: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:30 PM

Location(s):

Room 3138 of the Legislative Building, 401 S. Carson St., Carson City, NV.

Videoconference available at Room 120, High Tech Center, Great Basin College, 1290 Burns Rd,
Elko, NV

Videoconference a vailable at Room 4401 of the Grant Sawyer State Office Building, 555 E. Washington Ave.,
Las Vegas, NV.

Click here if you would like to take a bus to Carson City, we will be leaving from Phoenix and Las Vegas. https://docs.google.com/a/valetfleet.com/forms/d/1PqDPvH7FKhsYrgmZlBRSYrpW62kKv4yvpikA4Qwun1I/viewform

Bundy Ranch

March 27, 2015

IFR Approach in to Queensland New Zealand.

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 12:06 pm

A friend of mine suggested that they put cameras in the nose of airliners so the passengers could see what was happening. I responded by saying, no sir that would scare the hell out of them,. It scared the hell out of me and I was in the drivers seat.!! :-))

http://www.chonday.com/Videos/pilotnewzdalnd1

March 25, 2015

Hillary Clinton sued for racketeering, Democrats top choice, cant wait to watch this one!

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 10:17 pm

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/03/25/hillary-clinton-hit-with-racketeering-lawsuit-over-emails/21157577/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl5%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D633380

March 24, 2015

Ted Cruz Presidential Campaign Announcement, Home Run after Home Run!!

The left is scared to death of Ted Cruz,,, Remember what they the left tried to do to Reagan. Donnie Douche bag, Joes resident idiot, makes the same slanderous statements towards Cruz just like the socialist did towards Reagan in the 80s. Thanks MSNBC for giving stupid a mic.

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/03/25/hillary-clinton-hit-with-racketeering-lawsuit-over-emails/21157577/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl5%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D633380

March 7, 2015

The high cost of cheap money, the coming housing bubble , thanks to the federal reserve!

727 AND  726 ARE MUST SEE, IF YOU ACTUALLY WANT TO KNOW WHY THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS IS BEING ROBBED, BY THE CORPORATIONS ,Realtors, County Property Taxes!!!!

Shows383

04.03.2015 14:52 Episode 727… In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss the modern economic, financial and monetary …

02.03.2015 16:24 Episode 726… In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss the government’s economic policies apparently cooked …

27.02.2015 13:57 Episode 725… In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss bankrupting nations through inflation and/or …

January 25, 2015

Tax Revolt, end property taxes now, end the nepotisim in county corporations,Nothing less than grand theft!! Bring your Land Patent upto date, declare your property allodial!!!!

January 23, 2015

Arizona SB 1264 Pubic Lands Right A Way bill is being reintroduced as HB 2175 on Jan 27th 2015!!!

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 12:24 pm

Click on the following link to see the version of the bill: Come to the Capitol on Tuesday the 27th of Jan 2015 , to support this vital legislation for the future of all Arizonans!  Natural Resource Committee hearing room at 9:00 am.

http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/52leg/1r/bills/hb2175p.pdf

January 18, 2015

Change of pace :-)), enjoy!!, Flying South West, !!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: — thearizonasentinel @ 5:13 pm

January 14, 2015

Governor Doug Duceys State of the State !!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 12:59 pm

Sucking from the trough leads to brain washing!!! This guy is a idiot!!! Megyn Kelly exposes stupidity!!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 11:42 am

January 8, 2015

Will Fukushima Destroy America?

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 11:02 am

January 6, 2015

Louie Gohmert will run for Speaker!!! Vote today 1/6/2015 / Boehner must go!!!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 10:24 am

Gohmert Announces Run for Speaker of the House
f t # e
Washington, Jan 4 | 0 comments
Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding his decision to buck the status quo and challenge John Boehner in the race for House Speaker:

“After the November elections gave Republicans control of the Senate, voters made clear they wanted change. There have been numerous examples of problematic Republican leadership, but we were hopeful our leaders got the voters’ message. However, after our Speaker forced through the CRomnibus by passing it with Democratic votes and without time to read it, it seemed clear that we needed new leadership. There had been much discussion. But, until yesterday, no one had stepped up.

I applaud my friend Rep. Ted Yoho for putting his name forward as an alternative to the status quo. Ted is a good man for whom I could vote, but I have heard from many supporters and also friends in Congress who have urged me to put forward my name for Speaker as well to increase our chances of change. That is why I am also offering my name as a candidate for Speaker.

There is false information being floated that any Republican candidates in addition to the current Speaker will split the vote and give the Speaker’s gavel to Congresswoman Pelosi. This is nothing but a scare tactic to keep the current regime in power.

As long as Republicans vote for an adult American citizen for Speaker, no Democrat can win. Only if 59 Republicans voted “Present” would there be a chance for a Democrat to win.

To win the Speaker’s race, an adult American citizen has to get a clear majority of all Members of Congress on the House floor voting for an eligible person. Voting “Present” simply reduces the number of votes required to win a majority. If no one wins a majority on the first ballot, then we go to a second vote, then a third, until someone gets a majority.

At this point, the Speaker’s election is not about a particular candidate. It is about whether we keep the status quo or make the change the country demands. I am putting forward my name for consideration as Speaker and hope that with a new Speaker, be that me or someone else, we can fight for the ideals and principles that the voters wanted when they elected us in November.”

Congressman Gohmert is the Vice Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. Prior to being elected to serve in Congress, Louie was elected to three terms as District Judge in Smith County, Texas. He was appointed by Texas Governor Rick Perry to complete a term as Chief Justice of the 12th Court of Appeals.

January 5, 2015

This Ordinance should must be adopted in every county west of the Mississippi! President Clinton got it right!!

STATE OF ARIZONA
COUNTY OF GREENLEE

GREENLEE COUNTY ORIDINANCE NO._________
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING EXECUTIVE ORDER 13132 AS BINDING UPON ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCHES BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL WITHIN THE COUNTY OF GREENLEE

WHEREAS: Executive Order 13132 passed by President William Clinton and has not been repealed or replaced and filed into the public record at Federal Register Volume 64, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 10, 1999) Presidential Documents
Pages 43255-43259
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office http://www.gpo.gov
[FR Doc No: 99-20729]; and

WHEREAS: The County of Greenlee wishes to adopt Executive Order 13132 as written and attached herein as a part of this ordinance, each and every part without exception; and

WHEREAS: The County of Greenlee partakes of benefits from the Federal Government in the forms of grants, subsidies, and direct allocations in the nature of monies in lieu of taxes; and

WHEREAS: The County of Greenlee is a political subdivision of the union state Arizona with the presence of federal agencies and federal employees; and

WHEREAS: The state of Arizona has through its legislature and Governor enacted Arizona Revised Statute Chapter 26,(ARS 26-251through 26-253) and Arizona Revised Statute Chapter 37 (ARS 37-620.00 through 37-620.02) has not ceded Legislative Jurisdiction pursuant to Title 40 U.S.C. sections 3111 and 3112 to the United States and does not recognize any Federal Lands or Federal Enclaves within Greenlee County, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States at Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17. The researcher Wray S. Shildnect’s affidavit recorded in the public record in Greenlee County at 2007-00589, confirms the Congressional Report generated during the Eisenhower Administration entitled Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States, Part 1 and Part 2, April 1956 and 1957; and

WHEREAS: In the spirit of the “Separation of Powers Doctrine” and the “Cooperative Federalism Doctrine”; and

WHEREAS: In the spirit of the “Public Trust Doctrine” and the “Oath of Office” of each and every public official both state and federal; and

WHEREAS: Family based and run ranching, farming and mining operations have private property rights established under the common law, laws and customs of the times and recognized by the courts as grants under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, in the form of water rights, possessory rights and land patents; and

WHEREAS: Inhabitants of the local, rural communities have possessory rights in the nature of non commercial use of gravel, rock , wood, plant products such as pine nuts and hunting prescriptive easements and rights of way; and

WHEREAS: These pre-existing private property rights acquired under the local, disposal and pre-emption laws were recognized by the United States in the Guadalupe-Hidalgo Treaty of 1848, promulgated by “Kearny’s Code” of September 22, 1846 and the July 25, 1866 [14 stat. 251] right of way and other purpose Act, and every public land law thereafter; and

WHEREAS: The Constitution of the United States did not grant Authority over these lands pursuant to Article I Section 8 clause 17 and the plenary powers of the United States under the territorial clause at Article IV Section 3 clause 2 vanished upon statehood of Arizona on February 14, 1912 and the relationship between the republic state of Arizona and the United States is a cooperative relationship and the Constitution of the United States and the doctrine of “Separation of Powers” is still the highest law of the land ; and

WHEREAS: The Board of County Supervisors recognizes that the United States has no police powers within the boundaries of the state of Arizona and that the Board of County Supervisors is primarily responsible for the protection of the health, safety and well being (Police Powers) of the Citizens of Greenlee County and for the customs, culture and economic vitality of the county’s ranching, farming, mining and business economic sectors, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS: The Board of County Supervisors of Greenlee County under the Home Rule Doctrine of Arizona and the police powers and the Constitution of Arizona and the Laws of Arizona and the doctrine of “Lex Loci” and the Doctrine of “Comity” has a duty to establish the proper relationship of all parties concerned; and

WHEREAS: The Board of County Supervisors of Greenlee County under the laws of Arizona shall mandate that the sheriff of Greenlee County enforce the provisions of this Ordinance and to invoke the Posse Comitatus Act (The power and force of the county) to aid him in keeping the peace; and

WHEREAS: In the event of none compliance, that the Board of County Supervisors of Greenlee County, exercise the provisions of Section 8 Accountability and report to the office of Management and Budget the none compliance thereof the parts of Executive Order number 13132; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of Greenlee County, Arizona that this ordinance adopting Executive Order 13132 be adopted in its entirety without exception and the Executive Order 13132 by made a part of this ordinance; and

Section 1. PURPOSE

The purpose of the Greenlee County Ordinance is to establish harmony and to dispel the distrust that has been created by none compliance with federal mandates, the abuse of authority and disrespect for the laws that has affected the citizens, their properties and their liberties. It is to establish a policy of equal protection of laws both the mandates of Federal Law and mandates of State Law and enable federal agencies to fully comply with these mandates through coordination that enables the federal agencies to resolve inconsistencies between federal proposals and Greenlee County Policies. These mandates are included in the Organic Act of 1897, Taylor Grazing Act of 1934, FLPMA 1976 (90 State. 1743, Public Law 94-579) specifically Section 202(c)(9), Public Rangeland Improvement Act of 1978 Sections 4 and 8, the mandates of NEPA and to enforce Section 701 of FLPMA in regards to pre-existing rights in the nature of water, easements rights of way and possessory interests.

Section 2. COMPLIANCE WITH NEVADA OPEN MEETINGS ACT:

All meetings will conform to the requirements of the Arizona Open Meetings Act.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED during a regular Greenlee County Supervisor’s meeting on _______________, 2014

BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
GREENLEE COUNTY, ARIZONA

ATTEST: ________________________________
David Gomez District I

_________________________ ________________________________
Clerk Ron S. Campbell District II

(seal) __________________________________
Robert Corbell District III

[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 10, 1999)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 43255-43259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-20729]

Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 1999 /
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3–
The President

[[Page 43255]]

Executive Order 13132 of August 4, 1999

Federalism

By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, and in order to guarantee the division of
governmental responsibilities between the national
government and the States that was intended by the
Framers of the Constitution, to ensure that the
principles of federalism established by the Framers
guide the executive departments and agencies in the
formulation and implementation of policies, and to
further the policies of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) “Policies that have federalism implications”
refers to regulations, legislative comments or proposed
legislation, and other policy statements or actions
that have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
(b) “State” or “States” refer to the States of
the United States of America, individually or
collectively, and, where relevant, to State
governments, including units of local government and
other political subdivisions established by the States.
(c) “Agency” means any authority of the United
States that is an “agency” under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1),
other than those considered to be independent
regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).
(d) “State and local officials” means elected
officials of State and local governments or their
representative national organizations.

Sec. 2. Fundamental Federalism Principles. In
formulating and implementing policies that have
federalism implications, agencies shall be guided by
the following fundamental federalism principles:

(a) Federalism is rooted in the belief that issues
that are not national in scope or significance are most
appropriately addressed by the level of government
closest to the people.
(b) The people of the States created the national
government and delegated to it enumerated governmental
powers. All other sovereign powers, save those
expressly prohibited the States by the Constitution,
are reserved to the States or to the people.
(c) The constitutional relationship among sovereign
governments, State and national, is inherent in the
very structure of the Constitution and is formalized in
and protected by the Tenth Amendment to the
Constitution.
(d) The people of the States are free, subject only
to restrictions in the Constitution itself or in
constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define
the moral, political, and legal character of their
lives.
(e) The Framers recognized that the States possess
unique authorities, qualities, and abilities to meet
the needs of the people and should function as
laboratories of democracy.

[[Page 43256]]

(f) The nature of our constitutional system
encourages a healthy diversity in the public policies
adopted by the people of the several States according
to their own conditions, needs, and desires. In the
search for enlightened public policy, individual States
and communities are free to experiment with a variety
of approaches to public issues. One-size-fits-all
approaches to public policy problems can inhibit the
creation of effective solutions to those problems.
(g) Acts of the national government–whether
legislative, executive, or judicial in nature–that
exceed the enumerated powers of that government under
the Constitution violate the principle of federalism
established by the Framers.
(h) Policies of the national government should
recognize the responsibility of–and should encourage
opportunities for–individuals, families,
neighborhoods, local governments, and private
associations to achieve their personal, social, and
economic objectives through cooperative effort.
(i) The national government should be deferential
to the States when taking action that affects the
policymaking discretion of the States and should act
only with the greatest caution where State or local
governments have identified uncertainties regarding the
constitutional or statutory authority of the national
government.

Sec. 3. Federalism Policymaking Criteria. In addition
to adhering to the fundamental federalism principles
set forth in section 2, agencies shall adhere, to the
extent permitted by law, to the following criteria when
formulating and implementing policies that have
federalism implications:

(a) There shall be strict adherence to
constitutional principles. Agencies shall closely
examine the constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit the policymaking
discretion of the States and shall carefully assess the
necessity for such action. To the extent practicable,
State and local officials shall be consulted before any
such action is implemented. Executive Order 12372 of
July 14, 1982 (“Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs”) remains in effect for the programs and
activities to which it is applicable.
(b) National action limiting the policymaking
discretion of the States shall be taken only where
there is constitutional and statutory authority for the
action and the national activity is appropriate in
light of the presence of a problem of national
significance. Where there are significant uncertainties
as to whether national action is authorized or
appropriate, agencies shall consult with appropriate
State and local officials to determine whether Federal
objectives can be attained by other means.
(c) With respect to Federal statutes and
regulations administered by the States, the national
government shall grant the States the maximum
administrative discretion possible. Intrusive Federal
oversight of State administration is neither necessary
nor desirable.
(d) When undertaking to formulate and implement
policies that have federalism implications, agencies
shall:
L (1) encourage States to develop their own
policies to achieve program objectives and to work with
appropriate officials in other States;
L (2) where possible, defer to the States to
establish standards;
L (3) in determining whether to establish uniform
national standards, consult with appropriate State and
local officials as to the need for national standards
and any alternatives that would limit the scope of
national standards or otherwise preserve State
prerogatives and authority; and
L (4) where national standards are required by
Federal statutes, consult with appropriate State and
local officials in developing those standards.

[[Page 43257]]

Sec. 4. Special Requirements for Preemption. Agencies,
in taking action that preempts State law, shall act in
strict accordance with governing law.

(a) Agencies shall construe, in regulations and
otherwise, a Federal statute to preempt State law only
where the statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear evidence that
the Congress intended preemption of State law, or where
the exercise of State authority conflicts with the
exercise of Federal authority under the Federal
statute.
(b) Where a Federal statute does not preempt State
law (as addressed in subsection (a) of this section),
agencies shall construe any authorization in the
statute for the issuance of regulations as authorizing
preemption of State law by rulemaking only when the
exercise of State authority directly conflicts with the
exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute
or there is clear evidence to conclude that the
Congress intended the agency to have the authority to
preempt State law.
(c) Any regulatory preemption of State law shall be
restricted to the minimum level necessary to achieve
the objectives of the statute pursuant to which the
regulations are promulgated.
(d) When an agency foresees the possibility of a
conflict between State law and Federally protected
interests within its area of regulatory responsibility,
the agency shall consult, to the extent practicable,
with appropriate State and local officials in an effort
to avoid such a conflict.
(e) When an agency proposes to act through
adjudication or rulemaking to preempt State law, the
agency shall provide all affected State and local
officials notice and an opportunity for appropriate
participation in the proceedings.

Sec. 5. Special Requirements for Legislative Proposals.
Agencies shall not submit to the Congress legislation
that would:

(a) directly regulate the States in ways that would
either interfere with functions essential to the
States’ separate and independent existence or be
inconsistent with the fundamental federalism principles
in section 2;
(b) attach to Federal grants conditions that are
not reasonably related to the purpose of the grant; or
(c) preempt State law, unless preemption is
consistent with the fundamental federalism principles
set forth in section 2, and unless a clearly legitimate
national purpose, consistent with the federalism
policymaking criteria set forth in section 3, cannot
otherwise be met.

Sec. 6. Consultation.

(a) Each agency shall have an accountable process
to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and
local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. Within 90
days after the effective date of this order, the head
of each agency shall designate an official with
principal responsibility for the agency’s
implementation of this order and that designated
official shall submit to the Office of Management and
Budget a description of the agency’s consultation
process.
(b) To the extent practicable and permitted by law,
no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has
federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on State and local governments,
and that is not required by statute, unless:
L (1) funds necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the State and local governments in
complying with the regulation are provided by the
Federal Government; or
L (2) the agency, prior to the formal promulgation
of the regulation,

L (A) consulted with State and local officials early
in the process of developing the proposed
regulation;

[[Page 43258]]

L (B) in a separately identified portion of the
preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in
the Federal Register, provides to the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget a federalism
summary impact statement, which consists of a
description of the extent of the agency’s prior
consultation with State and local officials, a
summary of the nature of their concerns and the
agency’s position supporting the need to issue the
regulation, and a statement of the extent to which
the concerns of State and local officials have been
met; and

L (C) makes available to the Director of the Office
of Management and Budget any written communications
submitted to the agency by State and local
officials.

(c) To the extent practicable and permitted by law,
no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has
federalism implications and that preempts State law,
unless the agency, prior to the formal promulgation of
the regulation,
L (1) consulted with State and local officials
early in the process of developing the proposed
regulation;
L (2) in a separately identified portion of the
preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in the
Federal Register, provides to the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary
impact statement, which consists of a description of
the extent of the agency’s prior consultation with
State and local officials, a summary of the nature of
their concerns and the agency’s position supporting the
need to issue the regulation, and a statement of the
extent to which the concerns of State and local
officials have been met; and
L (3) makes available to the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget any written
communications submitted to the agency by State and
local officials.

Sec. 7. Increasing Flexibility for State and Local
Waivers.

(a) Agencies shall review the processes under which
State and local governments apply for waivers of
statutory and regulatory requirements and take
appropriate steps to streamline those processes.
(b) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable
and permitted by law, consider any application by a
State for a waiver of statutory or regulatory
requirements in connection with any program
administered by that agency with a general view toward
increasing opportunities for utilizing flexible policy
approaches at the State or local level in cases in
which the proposed waiver is consistent with applicable
Federal policy objectives and is otherwise appropriate.
(c) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable
and permitted by law, render a decision upon a complete
application for a waiver within 120 days of receipt of
such application by the agency. If the application for
a waiver is not granted, the agency shall provide the
applicant with timely written notice of the decision
and the reasons therefor.
(d) This section applies only to statutory or
regulatory requirements that are discretionary and
subject to waiver by the agency.

Sec. 8. Accountability.

(a) In transmitting any draft final regulation that
has federalism implications to the Office of Management
and Budget pursuant to Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, each agency shall include a
certification from the official designated to ensure
compliance with this order stating that the
requirements of this order have been met in a
meaningful and timely manner.
(b) In transmitting proposed legislation that has
federalism implications to the Office of Management and
Budget, each agency shall include a certification from
the official designated to ensure compliance with this
order that all relevant requirements of this order have
been met.

[[Page 43259]]

(c) Within 180 days after the effective date of
this order, the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget and the Assistant to the President for
Intergovernmental Affairs shall confer with State and
local officials to ensure that this order is being
properly and effectively implemented.

Sec. 9. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory
agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions
of this order.

Sec. 10. General Provisions.

(a) This order shall supplement but not supersede
the requirements contained in Executive Order 12372
(“Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs”),
Executive Order 12866 (“Regulatory Planning and
Review”), Executive Order 12988 (“Civil Justice
Reform”), and OMB Circular A-19.
(b) Executive Order 12612 (“Federalism”),
Executive Order 12875 (“Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership”), Executive Order 13083
(“Federalism”), and Executive Order 13095
(“Suspension of Executive Order 13083”) are revoked.
(c) This order shall be effective 90 days after the
date of this order.

Sec. 11. Judicial Review. This order is intended only
to improve the internal management of the executive
branch, and is not intended to create any right or
benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law
by a party against the United States, its agencies, its
officers, or any person.

(Presidential Sig.)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

August 4, 1999.

[FR Doc. 99-20729
Filed 8-9-99; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P

January 4, 2015

Great News, the results of voting for these bastards!!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 5:36 pm

Subject: Here is what happened on January 1, 2015 :

​WHO AUTHORIZED THIS ?​ Answer below….

Date: December 31, 2014 at 11:14:04 AM PST
HOLY MOLY!!
Here is what happened on Jan 1, 2015:
Top Medicare tax goes from 1.45% to 2.35%

Top Income tax bracket goes from 35% to 39.6%

Top Income payroll tax goes from 37.4% to 52.2%

Capital Gains tax goes from 15% to 28%

Dividends tax goes from 15% to 39.6%

Estate tax goes from 0% to 55%

Remember these facts:

These taxes were all passed only with Democrat votes, no Republicans voted for these taxes.

These taxes were all passed under the Affordable Care Act.

If you think that it is important that everyone in the U.S. should know this, pass it on. If not, then delete it.

Support the 1st and 2nd Amendments … one does not survive without the other!
“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves” Abraham Lincoln.

January 2, 2015

Will Americans wake up in time, not likely! Swedes are!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 2:49 pm

Subject: EIGHT PICTURES TO MAKE YOU THINK

There are no words to add to this!!! But Churchill saw it coming. Read his ending comment.

Makes you think!

IRAN 1970
image002

AFGHANISTAN

image003

image004

EGYPT (Cairo University) 1959

image006

EGYPT (Cairo University )

image007

NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 1980

image008

NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 2012

image009

…And some people still do not see a reason to worry!

Winston Churchill 1899. “Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.” ===============================================================================================

This is amazing. Even more amazing is that this hasn’t been published long before now.

CHURCHILL ON ISLAM Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899. (Check Wikipedia – The River War). The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late19th and 20th centuries. He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt.

He was a prophet in his own time. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. HERE IS THE SPEECH:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).

Churchill saw it coming.

Swedes are catching on !

http://www.jpost.com/International/Tensions-simmer-in-Sweden-with-third-mosque-arson-attack-in-past-eight-days-386463

December 18, 2014

One of these days , this little fella may come knocking on your door! Merry Christmas Everyone!!!!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 12:35 pm

December 16, 2014

This Test should be implemented in every state in America, I wonder how many members of Congress and the Supreme Court could pass it??

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 11:12 am

No Spin Zone Bill O’Reilly voter test!

U.S. CITIZENSHIP QUIZ
Get 15 or more correct to pass!

1. Who is considered to be the “Father of Our Country”?
George Washington
Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Christopher Columbus

2. Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?
George Washington
Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Christopher Columbus

3. What is the supreme law of the land?
The Executive Branch
The Constitution
The Honor System
The Bill of Rights
The Magna Carta

4. The notion of self-government is present in the first three words of the Constitution. What are the three words?
United we stand…
Give me your…
We the people…
Congress shall make…
You have the…

5. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are called…
Article One
The Bill of Rights
The Declaration of Independence
The Federalist Papers
The Preamble

6. How many amendments does the Constitution have in total?
1
10
27
50
142

7. What is one right or freedom NOT provided by the First Amendment?
speech
religion
assembly
pursuit of happiness
petition the government

8. How many U.S. senators are there and how long is a senator’s term?
50 senators; 2 years
50 senators; 6 years
100 senators; 2 years
100 senators; 6 years

9. Why do some states have more representatives than other states?
States with more people have more representatives
States with more land have more representatives
Each state has the same number of representatives
Each state’s number of representatives is random

10. What other position does the commander in chief of the military hold?
President
Vice President
Speaker of the House
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense

11. If both the president and the vice president can no longer serve, who becomes president?
Attorney General
House Majority Leader
Speaker of the House
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense

12. Which of the following is not a branch of government?
Executive
Legislative
Financial
Judicial
None of the above

13. What stops any one branch of government from becoming too powerful?
Executive Orders
The United Nations
The National Security Agency
A system of checks and balances
Journalists and the national media

14. Under our Constitution, some powers belong to the federal government, and some powers belong to the states. Which is not a power of the federal government?
print money
provide driver’s licenses
declare war
create an army
make treaties

15. Who was president during World War I?
Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon B. Johnson
Richard Nixon
Franklin D. Roosevelt
George H.W. Bush

16. Who did the United States fight in World War II?
Germany
Japan
Italy
All of the above
None of the above

17. How old must a citizen be to vote for president?
16
17
18
21
25

18. What is the economic system in the United States?
Socialist
Communist
Capitalist
Mercantilist
Laissez-faire

19. Which state does not border Mexico?
California
Arizona
Nevada
New Mexico
Texas

20. Which of the following is NOT an American Indian tribe in the United States?
Cherokee
Sioux
Iroquois
Apache
Sabine

21. When is the last day you can send in federal income tax returns?
January 1
April 15
May 20
July 4
December 31

22. What is the political party of the current president?
Republican
Democrat

23. What is the capital of the United States?
Philadelphia, PA
Annapolis, MD
New York, NY
Washington, DC
Juneau, AK

24. What do the stripes on the American flag represent?
The number of signatures on the Declaration of Independence
The number of signatures on the Constitution
The original 10 colonies
The original 13 colonies
Nothing

25. Which of the following is not a federal holiday?
Memorial Day
Election Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veterans Day

Anwsers :

Your score: 0 / 25 correct Quiz Average: 19.75 correct
Incorrect 1. Who is considered to be the “Father of Our Country”?

ANSWER: George Washington
Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Christopher Columbus

2. Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?

George Washington
Alexander Hamilton
ANSWER: Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Christopher Columbus

3. What is the supreme law of the land?

ANSWER: The Constitution

The Honor System
The Bill of Rights
The Magna Carta

4. The notion of self-government is present in the first three words of the Constitution. What are the three words?

United we stand…
Give me your…
ANSWER: We the people…
Congress shall make…
You have the…

5. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are called…

Article One
ANSWER: The Bill of Rights
The Declaration of Independence
The Federalist Papers
The Preamble

6. How many amendments does the Constitution have in total?

1
10
ANSWER: 27
50
142

7. What is one right or freedom NOT provided by the First Amendment?

speech
religion
assembly
ANSWER: pursuit of happiness
petition the government

8. How many U.S. senators are there and how long is a senator’s term?

50 senators; 2 years
50 senators; 6 years
100 senators; 2 years
ANSWER: 100 senators; 6 years

9. Why do some states have more representatives than other states?

ANSWER: States with more people have more representatives
States with more land have more representatives
Each state has the same number of representatives
Each state’s number of representatives is random

10. What other position does the commander in chief of the military hold?

ANSWER: President
Vice President
Speaker of the House
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense

11. If both the president and the vice president can no longer serve, who becomes president?

Attorney General
House Majority Leader
ANSWER: Speaker of the House
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense

12. Which of the following is not a branch of government?

Executive
Legislative
ANSWER: Financial
Judicial
None of the above

13. What stops any one branch of government from becoming too powerful?

Executive Orders
The United Nations
The National Security Agency
ANSWER: A system of checks and balances
Journalists and the national media

14. Under our Constitution, some powers belong to the federal government, and some powers belong to the states. Which is not a power of the federal government?

print money
ANSWER: provide driver’s licenses
declare war
create an army
make treaties

15. Who was president during World War I?

ANSWER: Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon B. Johnson
Richard Nixon
Franklin D. Roosevelt
George H.W. Bush

16. Who did the United States fight in World War II?

Germany
Japan
Italy
ANSWER: All of the above

17. How old must a citizen be to vote for president?

16
17
ANSWER: 18
21
25

18. What is the economic system in the United States?

Socialist
Communist
ANSWER: Capitalist
Mercantilist
Laissez-faire

19. Which state does not border Mexico?

California
Arizona
ANSWER: Nevada
New Mexico
Texas

20. Which of the following is NOT an American Indian tribe in the United States?

Cherokee
Sioux
Iroquois
Apache
ANSWER: Sabine

21. When is the last day you can send in federal income tax returns?

January 1
ANSWER: April 15
May 20
July 4
December 31

22. What is the political party of the current president?

Republican
ANSWER: Democrat

23. What is the capital of the United States?

Philadelphia, PA
Annapolis, MD
New York, NY
ANSWER: Washington, DC
Juneau, AK

24. What do the stripes on the American flag represent?

The number of signatures on the Declaration of Independence
The number of signatures on the Constitution
The original 10 colonies
ANSWER: The original 13 colonies
Nothing

25. Which of the following is not a federal holiday?

Memorial Day
ANSWER: Election Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veterans Day

Farming by Corporations/Government, Read Animal Factories by David Kirby!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 10:47 am

Watch: Factory Farm Whistleblower Unveils Disturbing Video
‘Sustainable’ farm conditions revealed
by Anthony Gucciardi | Infowars.com | December 7, 2014

http://www.infowars.com/watch-factory-farm-whistleblower-unveils-disturbing-video/

Does ‘sustainable’ farming really mean what you think it does? We’ve all seen the concerning images and videos depicting abused and sickly animals set for sale for the lowest possible price point, but very few have seen inside of a major ‘sustainable’ factory farm that even the USDA says passes its standard of care.

A North Carolina contractor for meat processing giant Perdue has now unveiled what truly happens behind these ‘better’ farming operations that we are made to believe are the much better option for ourselves and our families. The result: a very disturbing reminder to eat a high quality organic diet:

As a contractor for Perdue, farmer Craig Watts says he is contractually obligated to ensure that the chickens destined for your dinner table do not receive any form of sunlight or fresh air. In addition, the chickens are forced to lay not only on their own bed of feces, but feces that has accumulated for around the past year. This is because the floors are not cleaned between each import of new chickens, leading to thick layers of feces, other bodily fluids, limbs, and other items accumulating to the point where the underbellies of the chickens are worn red and their feathers are rubbed clean off. Is it any wonder that around 97% of all chicken products have been found to be tainted with harmful bacteria?

This is what millions around the world are paying for with their hard earned dollar, and it’s what major factory farms are selling off as ‘organic.’ Always remember that whenever corporations can use natural-style ‘buzz words’ to draw in customers without actually staying true to these labels, they most certainly will.

It’s up to you to purchase high quality organic items for you and your family, and to support initiatives to retake words like ‘natural’ away from corporations that would rather pay animal cruelty fines than change their practices.

Perdue farmer Craig Watts is likely in for a round of contractual lawsuits, however if Perdue is smart, they will not publicly sue Mr. Watts in order to avoid public backlash. I would expect, rather, for the company to issue a statement that Mr. Watts is in fact the individual responsible for the poor treatment, and that they are ‘evaluating’ their procedures.

December 14, 2014

Obama’s,House and Senates gift to America, fundamentaley transforming America!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 11:38 am

December 13, 2014

North Dakota names their dump after Obama, seems fitting!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 4:54 pm

——————————————————————————–

Subj: North Dakota Names Landfill After Obama

> > North Dakota Names Landfill After Obama

> > The state of North Dakota has named a new publicly-owned landfill after President Barack Obama.
> > In an overwhelming 35-10 vote, the state Senate advanced a bill naming a 650-acre site currently under construction after the nation’s 44th president. Governor Jack Dalrymple is expected to sign the measure into law Tuesday.
> > When completed, the Barack Obama Memorial Landfill will be the largest waste disposal site in North Dakota, and the 17th largest in the United States. It will be especially rich in toxic waste from the local petroleum and medical industries.
> > “We wanted to do something to honor the president,” says Republican State Senator Doug Perlman, who was the lead sponsor of the bill. “And I think a pile of garbage is a fitting tribute to Obama’s presidency.
> > “We originally planned on naming it after a nearby mountain. But then someone jokingly suggested we name it after Obama. I never thought an idea like that would actually pass. But I was pleasantly surprised.”
> > The president is hardly popular in North Dakota. The most recent poll in December 2013 found that Obama has a 35% approval rating in the state, although that figure may have fallen further in the year since. Yet even considering the political climate, seasoned observers are surprised that two Democratic lawmakers voted for the bill’s passage.
> > “I supported Obama because I thought he would end the wars in the Middle East;” says Allison Mitchell, a progressive Democrat from Grand Forks. “But he decided to fight new wars abroad instead of fighting for single-payer health care and jobs here at home.
> > “I guess people expected me to oppose this landfill thing because I’m a Democrat. But honestly I don’t really care anymore. Maybe this small act of protest will wake him up.”
> > Ordinary citizens in the state also seem to approve of the government’s choice.
> > “I can’t think of a better name,” says Joe Blough, a plumber from Minot. “It’s darkly colored and it’s full of shit. That pretty much sums up Obama.”

=

Older Posts »

The WordPress Classic Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Recent Items

Reading Secondhand, Library and Bargain Basement Books

A Lawman Speaks for Liberty

Border and National Security, Private Property rights, Removing Federal agencies from the states,American Energy Policy, Constitutional Conservative

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers