The Arizona Sentinel

February 21, 2012

Government Officials and Bank Executives Resign around the world. We’ll let you figure out why.

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 7:19 pm

GOVERNMENT RESIGNATIONS    If you want a clue, click on the link at the bottom  Benjamin Fulford he may be on to something!!!!

2/6/12
Romanian prime minister and cabinet resign en masse
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/06/romania-pm-cabinet-resign

2/20/12 (GERMANY) GERMAN PRESIDENT Christian Ruff resigns (financial corruption charges)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102524/German-President-Christian-Wulff-forced-resign.html

RESIGNATIONS FROM WORLD BANKS:

(1) 9/25/11 (SWITZERLAND) Bank chief resigns over £1.5bn rogue trader crisis
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2041385/Oswald-Gruebel-resigns-UBS-boss-steps-Kweku-Adoboli-trading-scandal.html

(2) 10/29/11 (CHINA) Resignations Suggest Shift for China’s Banks
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203687504577003734190522426.html

(3) 11/01/12 (INDIA) More directors of the Beed district bank resign
http://www.thenews.coop/article/more-directors-beed-district-bank-resign

(4) 11/21/11 (JAPAN) UBS’s Japan Investment Banking Chairman Matsui to Resign
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-22/ubs-s-japan-investment-banking-chairman-yasuki-matsui-to-resign.html

(5) 11/29/11 (Iran) Iran’s Bank Melli CEO Resigns Over Loan Scam
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xlcznz_iran-s-bank-melli-ceo-resigns-over-loan-scam_news

(6) 12/15/11 (UNITED KINGDOM) Senior private banker resigns from Coutts [a very exclusive private bank]
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/15/coutts-fleming-idUSL6E7NF23S20111215

(7) 12/22/11 (FRANCE) Societe Generale’s Investment Banking Chief Steps Down
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/socgens-investment-banking-chief-steps-down/

(8) 1/05/12 (UNITED KINGDOM) Chief executive of Saunderson House [Private Bank] steps down
http://www.ftadviser.com/2012/01/05/ifa-industry/people/saunderson-house-chief-executive-steps-down-M0vEWlpbSqKA3OCLZDCcGM/article.html

(9)1/09/12 (SWITZERLAND) Switzerland’s central bank chief resigns
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/01/201219145612935171.html

(10) 1/12/12 (United Kingdom) Lloyds’ head of wholesale quits
http://www.bankingtimes.co.uk/2012/02/01/lloyds-head-of-wholesale-quits/

(11) 1/19/12 (SPAIN) Spanish bank Santander’s Americas chief quits
http://www.expatica.com/es/news/spanish-news/spanish-bank-santander-s-americas-chief-quits_202395.html

(12) 1/20/12 (JAPAN) Normura’s head of wholesale banking quits
http://www.euromoney.com/Article/2959021/Nomuras-head-of-wholesale-banking-quits.html

(13) 1/29/12 (NEW ZEALAND) New Zealand Reserve Bank Governor Alan Bollard to Step Down in September
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-29/new-zealand-reserve-bank-governor-alan-bollard-to-step-down-in-september.html

(14) 1/21/12 (Greece) Banks’ top negotiator quits Greece, but talks go on
http://www.france24.com/en/20120121-banks-top-negotiator-quits-greece-but-talks-go

(15) 2/06/12 (INDIA) Dhanlaxmi Bank CEO Amitabh Chaturvedi quits: http://www.livemint.com/2012/02/06160111/Dhanlaxmi-Bank-CEO-Amitabh-Cha.html

(16) 2/07/12 (INDIA) Falguni Nayar quits Kotak Mahindra Bank
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-02-07/news/31031134_1_kotak-mahindra-bank-falguni-nayar-shanti-ekambaram

(17) 2/07/12 (IRAN) Iran denies central bank resignation rumor (don’t believe until its denied?)
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/iran-denies-central-bank-resignation-164154294.html

(18) 2/09/12 (VATICAN) Four Priests Charged In Vatican Banking Scandal
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-02-09/europe/31040509_1_anti-money-laundering-law-vatican-finances-italian-tv

(19) 2/10/12 (INDIA) Tamilnad Mercantile Bank CEO resigns

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/tamilnad-mercantile-bank-md-resigns/464259/

(20) 2/13/12 (KUWAIT) Kuwait Central Bank CEO resigns
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/industries/kuwait-central-bank-chief-resigns-amid-political-tensions/2012/02/13/gIQAcxrOAR_story.html

(21) 2/14/12 (NICARAQUA) Nicaraqua Central Bank Pres Rosales resigns
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-14/nicaragua-central-bank-head-quits-amid-row.html

(22) 2/14/12 (UNITED KINGDOM) Social finance pioneer Hayday steps down from Charity Bank
http://www.socialenterpriselive.com/section/news/people/20120214/social-finance-pioneer-hayday-steps-down-charity-bank

(23) 2/15/12 World Bank CEO Zoellick resigns
http://business.time.com/2012/02/15/world-bank-president-zoellick-resigns/

Did the White House tell the World Bank president that he’s out?
http://bosco.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/15/did_the_white_house_tell_the_world_bank_president_that_hes_out

(24) 2/15/12 (SLOVENIA) Slovenia TWO largest Banks CEO’s (2) resign
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-15/slovenia-s-nova-kreditna-banka-maribor-ceo-plos-resigns.html

(25) 2/15/12 (KENYA) Governor of Kenyan Central Bank to Resign
http://www.centralbanking.com/central-banking/news/2152753/parliamentary-committee-calls-kenyan-governor-resign

(26) 2/16/12 (GHANA) Ken Ofori-Atta steps down as Executive Chair of Databank Group
http://business.thinkghana.com/pages/finance/201202/57429.php

(27) 2/16/12 (SAUDI ARABIA) Saudi Hollandi Banks Managing Director Quits
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZVfFZypqVIcJ:www.a1saudiarabia.com/4489-saudi-hollandi-banks-md-quits/+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

(28) 2/16/12 (AUSTRALIA) Anz Bank CFO Australia resigns
http://www.proformative.com/news/1470243/cfo-anz-bank-resigns-amid-turmoill

(29) 2/16/12 (AUSTRALIA) Royal Bank of Scotland Austrailan CEO Stephen Williams resigns
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/andrew-chick-to-lead-royal-bank-of-scotlands-australian-arm/story-fnay3vxj-1226272513981

(30) 2/17/12 (USA) Blankfein out as Goldman Sachs CEO by summer
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/17/gary-cohn-goldman-sachs/

(31) 2/18/12 (PAKISTAN) AJK Bank’s executive steps down
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/national/18-Feb-2012/ajk-bank-s-executive-steps-down?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online%2F24hours-news+%28The+Nation+%3A+Latest+News%29

(32) 2/20/12 (RUSSIA) Head of Russian Bank Regulator Steps Down
http://newsley.com/articles/head-of-russian-bank-regulator-steps-down/206711

(33) 2/20/12 (SWITZERLAND) Credit Suisse Chief Joseph Tan resigns
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-20/credit-suisse-s-private-bank-chief-asian-economist-tan-resigns.html

(34) 2/10/12 (KOREA) Korea Exchange Bank chief steps down
http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2012/02/10/0503000000AEN20120210005100320.HTML

http://benjaminfulford.net/

***************************************************************************

Veterans for Ron Paul March on the White House

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 3:29 pm

http://youtu.be/T8tX4mmo_RY

Veterans turn their backs to Obama the Usurper!!!!  Wake up Congress , we’re coming for you next.!!!

http://youtu.be/mzF4BIwnZG4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_cKG7rfqfY&feature=related

The elite media speaks of President Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, but they avoid their message at all cost.  Only one man speaks the truth today,  Dr. Ron Paul.

http://youtu.be/APl1zJPRUcc

Ron Paul Modern Day Thomas Jefferson,Glenn Beck finally wakes up and supports Ron Paul! Corupt Republicans counting votes!!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 8:36 am

The Republican Party is Corrupt. See the last Video.  Every member of the House and Senate, in Washington has signed on to a corrupt political election system. Its time to cut the head off of this snake. Refuse to vote , unless there is a monitored hand count.

February 19, 2012

The elimination of Property Taxes is moving forward.

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 4:29 pm

North Dakota property tax initiative qualifies for June 2012 ballot

May 2, 2011

North Dakota

BISMARCK, North Dakota: One month following petition signature submissions, Secretary of State Al Jaeger confirmed that the proposed property tax amendment will be headed to the June 2012 statewide ballot.[1] The measure will appear as Measure 2 on the June ballot and marks the fourth measure certified for a 2012 ballot in the state.

The initiated constitutional amendment  proposes eliminating property taxes throughout the state, starting in 2012. Specifically, the measure requires legislature to replace local governments’ property tax income with state tax revenue.[2]

The measure was previously proposed for the 2010 ballot but failed to submit signatures. Despite being filed in 2010, the petition was valid until March 29, 2011. According to new census numbers, the measure now requires a minimum of 26,904 valid signatures in order to qualify for the 2012 ballot.[3] Supporters of the proposed measure submitted an estimated 27,800 signatures. On April 29 Jaeger reported that the measure had more than 28,000 valid signatures thus qualifying the measure for the statewide ballot.[1]

See also

Ballotpedia News
Propositions Recall Law

References

Ron Paul Trumps Obama , no surprise there, Freedom wins everytime!!! Start Packing Barry!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 3:58 pm

The Constitution vs Communist Manifesto!

Poll: Ron Paul triumphs over Obama in Iowa

The State Column | Sunday, February 19, 2012

 

5Share

 

Republican presidential candidates Ron Paul, Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney defeated President Barack Obama in a Des Moines Register poll of Iowa general election voters Sunday. Mr. Paul bested Mr. Obama by 7 percentage points (49 to 42) and Mr. Santorum bettered the president by 4 percentage points (48 to 44). Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney exceeded Mr. Obama by 2 percentage points (46 to 44).

Mr. Paul triumphed over Mr. Obama by a wider margin than Mr. Santorum, despite the fact that the Pennsylvania Republican won the Iowa Republican caucuses on January 3rd with 24.6 percent of the votes.

Mr. Paul and Mr. Santorum worked extremely hard in the Hawkeye State to gain supporters. The Pennsylvania Republican drove around Iowa in a pickup truck shaking hands and the Texas congressman utilized his popularity among younger voters to implement a “Christmas Vacation with Ron Paul” program that deployed nearly 500 youth to knock on doors and make phone calls for the Republican candidate.

Mr. Obama fared much better against former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. The president defeated Mr. Gingrich by 14 percentage points (51 to 37). Although the Georgia Republican was a popular candidate among Iowa voters towards the end of 2011, Mr. Romney’s relentless attack ads stripped Mr. Gingrich of his front-runner status in the Iowa Republican caucuses. Mr. Gingrich finished in fourth place with 13.3 percent of the votes.

The Des Moines Register poll of 800 adults and 611 likely voters in the general election was conducted from February 12th through February 15th. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points among likely voters.

 

Read more: http://www.thestatecolumn.com/articles/2012/02/19/poll-ron-paul-triumphs-over-obama-in-iowa/#ixzz1mrZN3JPo

February 17, 2012

Obama Headed for Court in Arizona, Meet him at the Airport Joe!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: — thearizonasentinel @ 9:31 pm

This is great news.  He’s going to be here anyway, recruiting illegals.   Meet him at the airport Joe . Give him a Sheriffs escort to County, they can depose him there.  Are you still talking to ICE???  I guess the question is , who’s gonna run , Hillary or Joe B.? By the  time the convention rolls around , every state in the nation will have court challenges.   The world is watching !!

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/new-arizona-obama-ballot-challenge-filed-today

Obama Aint out of the Woods yet, Eligibility now goes to Superior Court. Malihi should be disbarred!!!

Appeal Of Obama Eligibility Decision Filed Yesterday

February 17, 2012  By Leave a Comment

Obama Eligibility Appeal Of Obama Eligibility Decision Filed Yesterday

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed an appeal with the Georgia Superior Court in the case of Weldon v Obama, one of the three Georgia lawsuits claiming Barack Hussein Obama to be Constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States or to be included on the Georgia ballot.

It is perhaps significant that the very act of filing the appeal was fought by the Superior Court clerk’s office which claimed that an additional $2 fee had not been included with Liberty Legal’s paperwork for the filing of separate motions.

Additionally, the Court Clerk invented numerous excuses to prevent the filing, moving from one to the next whenever it was pointed out by Liberty Legal attorneys that none reflected normal court operating procedure. According to Liberty Legal attorney Van Irion, the clerk’s conduct was, in the course of his entire legal experience, “unheard of.”

As a side note, although the paperwork had been provided some 7 days earlier, the clerk’s office failed to inform Liberty that there was a problem. The clerk simply “sat on the petition” and the filing deadline of TODAY would have been missed had Irion not called to make certain the filing had taken place!

The appeal itself is based upon the claim that the “rights of the appellant [had] been prejudiced because the finding of the Secretary of State (was) affected by…error of law.”

That is, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who approved Judge Michael Malihi’s Administrative Court decision, had done so in spite of (or due to) mistakes of law made by the Judge in deciding the case.

As Irion states in the appeal, the decision of the Judge “not only violates…precedent and rules of construction, it runs contrary to Supreme Court precedent.”

Specifically, Liberty Legal argues that the decision of the court:

  1. 1.       Violated rules of Constitutional construction
  2. 2.       Misapplied Minor v Happersett  (1875 Supreme Court case)
  3. 3.       Ignored the clear definition and precedential status of Natural Born Citizen in Minor
  4. 4.       Ignored the Minor Court’s discussion of other categories of citizens
  5. 5.       Ignored a Minor Court holding concerning the 14th Amendment
  6. 6.       Relied upon the severely flawed Indiana State Court ruling, Ankeny v Governor

Along with the appeal, Liberty filed a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Secretary of State from including Obama on the Democrat primary ballot in March.

Also of importance, although Judge Malihi received a “Motion for Contempt” from Liberty Legal attorney Irion concerning Obama’s willfully ignoring a subpoena and failure to appear at the January 26th Court hearing, Judge Malihi refused to certify the facts of the motion to the Superior Court. In short, he just SAT on it and did nothing, contrary to the CLEAR demands of Georgia law! And NOW the Court claims it no longer has jurisdiction over the motion because the case has moved on from the court!

What will the ruling be on the Petition for Appeal? Given the obvious and overwhelming judicial misfeasance—possibly malfeasance—on the part of Administrative Court Judge Malihi we can rest assured that failure on the part of the Superior Court to overturn will be a clear indication of either bias or cowardice.

And such an unwillingness on the part of the American judiciary to honorably perform its moral and Constitutional duties for either reason would spell disaster for the legal system. For it would afford ample reason that the American public might ignore the very legitimacy of the law itself.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Conservative news straight to your inbox!

  • Email*

February 14, 2012

Wealth ReDistribution, We’ve been doing it for Years,RENEWING AMERICA BOTTOM UP! Let the Revolution Begin!

Its February 2012 and everyone is in a tizzy over the Republicans running for President.  Really?  Why, does anyone really think that at the end of the day. Who ever winds up in the White House, Ron Paul the exception, that we will see our Constitution resurrected, our liberty and freedoms restored?  Lets talk turkey.

Over the past two decades we’ve seen the Republicrats, explode the national debt, start wars and not for the reasons you’ve been told,

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/05/28/99838/argentine-prime-bush-war/?mobile=nc  didn’t you ever wonder why bush refused to close our border, while putting troops on IraQ’s?  As a veteran myself this confirms what we already knew. I hope you will send this to every one you know including veterans,active and inactive military members here and around the globe.

the video, you can’t make this stuff up, http://youtu.be/fI446mXonu0  for all you folks that have doubts about 911 , if this doesn’t wake you up nothing will.

The truth is, nothing will change and here is why.  The Congress has abrogated its authority to the Executive branch, and the Supreme Court is constantly coming down outside of the Constitution when ever possible. During my campaign efforts two years ago , I made several candidates that were running for house seats in dc mad as hell because I said , it did not matter who we send out there, they get bought off the day after they are sworn in.  Look at the budget deal last August, and this NDAA deal , not to mention Lybia and Egypt. I rest my case.  We all know the failures of all three branches so there is no sense in going over them here.  If you need a list, we’ll get you one.  But the question is what do we do about it.  Well two years ago, I was preaching around the state that it was going to be left up to the governors and state legislatures to turn the country around.  In fact some are in fact working in that direction. Arizona, Wisconsin and Oklahoma come to mind.  Short of that , we now see where the real authority and ability exists. It’s at the county level.  County Sheriffs and County Commissioners or Supervisors.  If we are going to remain a Free Republic, the people with in those counties are going to have to step up and say to the federal and state governments , we’ve had enough and were mad as hell.  Well I’ve met some of those folks recently .  And just in the last 30 days I’ve learned of another fraud that’s been perpetrated on the American People.  All my life its burned my backside to have to rent my home from some governmental body, knowing that the Constitution gives me the unalienable right to own private property. The question then becomes how do they legally tax your home, the answer is simple, they don’t they tax it illegally.  And over the next few months we are going to be presenting at town halls , conference calls and blog sites such as this one , the explanation of how we’ve been unconstitutionally taxed on our domiciles as Citizens of these United States.   I m not the resident expert here , but I’ll do the best I can.

First, lets start with the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land.  Our founding documents guarantee us that is Citizens, the Rights to Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness,  remembering that the original language stated “the right to private property”.  Further, since the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land.  When states were granted state hood, they agreed that they would recognize and accept the constitution and every protection with in it.

Now here is where the fun begins.  And for this discussion we are going to talk about Arizona only. But its fair to say, the same likely exists in your state as well.

Let me say here that for those of you that want to dive into the weeds of this issue to thoroughly understand this issue , we will gladly provide those to you on request.  Just send an email to arizonasentinel@aol.com , in the subject line,  type,  Private Property tax fraud,  that way it wont go to spam , and we wind up not seeing your request.

What we have learned is this . If you are a Citizen of the United States , you have a right to own , free and unencumbered by any taxing authority your domicile.  To clarify, you must understand the definition of Citizen. There are two recognized class’s of occupancy.  Citizen and Resident. A resident does not meet the  guarantee’s of the Constitution.  So in our view for example, Barry Soetoro aka, Barrack Obama would be classified as a resident, therefore his place of residence would be taxable.  Why , because his home of record according to his and Michelle’s own verbal recorded words tell us that he is from Kenya.  He can own property, but he does not qualify as a Citizen and therefore is not afforded the guarantee’s of the Constitution.And as far as anyone knows  Barry has never applied for citizenship.

In short what we’ve learned is that the people responsible for taxing policy , either can’t read and comprehend or simply find it to troublesome to know the laws of the land/Arizona. Well that’s gonna change.

We will gladly forward the documents for your study and review.  If you have any questions we will seek out the answers to the best of our ability.  At the end of the day , know this , we are going to pursue this.  For decades Arizona and the counties therein , and surely the other contiguous states have been fraudulently taxing American Citizens for a  Unalienable Right as Guaranteed by the Constitution.

We believe that once you’ve read the documents we will send you , you will see that we’ve been snookered once again by government.

Also we would like to know in what state do you live. we are going to try to find individuals or groups that will press on with this issue.

We can save America from the Bottom up, history proves a Top down approach will never succeed.

The Revolution must begin NOW!  ::http://youtu.be/fOaCemmsnNk   The Judge!

February 13, 2012

Obama Eligibility issue will be raised in Penn. Another Judge to be bought off.

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , — thearizonasentinel @ 8:02 am

Obama to Be Filed in PA This Week

Posted by By at 12 February, at 21 : 23 PM Print

A Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Candidate Obama to Be Filed in PA This Week

Charles Kerchner and his attorney Mario Apuzzo took a previous eligibility case all way to the Supreme Court, which cowardly refused to even hear it. Now, he is  going with a PA state ballot challenge, which WILL get standing.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and a Group of Citizens in Pennsylvania will File a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Candidate Obama Later This Week

A law firm has been retained and a group of plaintiffs formed up.  The name of the law firm and attorney and the names of the plaintiffs in addition to CDR Kerchner (Ret) will be announced via the filing and at a press conference immediately following the filing of the objection and challenge in Harrisburg PA.  The exact date, time, and location will be announced later this week.  Stay tuned. Follow this blog by signing up as a follower via WordPress or via Twitter or Facebook using the links in upper right of this blog.

We need your help. To donate to help this legal battle see this link:  https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund/PA

For the past several months CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against candidate Barack Hussein Obama II in Pennsylvania on the fact that Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father Obama Sr. was a FOREIGN NATIONAL.

Read more On Cdr. Kerchners’s blog:

http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/a-ballot-access-challengeobjection-to-candidate-obama-to-be-filed-in-pa-this-week/

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA.  ”Obama” is not either.

Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook

February 12, 2012

Existing US Law on INS.gov Website says Obama in Ineligible. Ballot Access denied!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , — thearizonasentinel @ 3:49 pm

Existing US Law on INS .gov Website Says Obama is Ineligible

Posted by By at 12 February, at 18 : 57 PM Print

Existing US Law on INS .gov Website Says Obama is Ineligible

This one from eligibility expert attorney Leo Donofrio has been making the rounds on the Internet. I suppose we should put this in our Natural Born Citizenship section of the site for peoples’ ready reference.

 

On the eve of Obama’s eligibility hearing Leo Donofrio reveals a new nail in Obama’s coffin (from Sam Sewell’s Steady Drip blog)

Existing US Law on INS .gov Website Says Obama is Ineligible

 

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

 

Sam adds some verbiage, as follows:

I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html

 

He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actually three at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

 

Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:

 

“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)

 

Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:

 

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

 

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922?, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)

 

And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:

 

“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)

 

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48438.html

 

Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.

 

The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:

“Interpretations were created to supplement and clarify the provisions of the statute and regulations as interpreted by the courts. These materials usually are not included in the regulations because they deal generally with procedural matters and do not deal directly with application and benefit requirements. They are still a useful tool to help you understand how the DHS Bureaus performs their different immigration services and enforcement functions. Users of the Operation Instructions and Interpretations should always consult the relevant regulations and manuals in conjunction with these materials. As the DHS Bureaus have grown, the trend has been towards inclusion of more materials in the regulations and field manuals, and the Operations Instructions and Interpretations have been updated less frequently.”

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/the-mccreery-v-somerville-funeral-maskell-and-gray-to-attend-minor-v-happersett-to-preside/#comment-20584

I’m not a lawyer but I am a well educated critical thinker. Your research and analysis deserve to prevail.

The problem that many people don’t understand is that this accurate understanding of the constitutional definition of “natural born” has not yet been directly applied to AKA Obama.

I think I am correct in assuming that until a case is decided that actually involves AKA Obama your analysis, correct as it might be, remains an intellectual exercise and has no potency as an argument until AKA Obama is a defendant.

What is desperately needed is a case actually being heard with AKA Obama as a defendant. Without a case to take to the SCOTUS AKA Obama’s ineligibility remains an opinion in a public debate with no legal authority.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.

 

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either. See: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

 

Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook

 

Ballot News Blog, Natural Born Citizenship, Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , ,

Older Posts »

Theme: WordPress Classic. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.