The Arizona Sentinel

Another Dumb ass Judge, Unable to read the Constitution. However,

thearizonasentinel — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:43:18 +0000

The fact is he was born in Kenya. Watch the video in the post below this one!!! Even his grandmother knew where he was born. And it wasnt in Hawaii. These fools in black robes, are killing this country.

CERTIFIGATE

Judge says Obama can be on Georgia ballot

Rejects plaintiffs demand to strike name from 2012 election

Published: 2 hours ago

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band.More ↓Less ↑

Subscribe to author feed

An administrative law judge in Georgia today ruled that Barack Obama’s name can be on the state’s 2012 presidential election ballot because he was born in Hawaii, is “native born” and thus also is “natural born” as required by the Constitution.

He cited a little-known determination by an Indiana judge.

“The Indiana court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States because he became a United States citizen at birth,” wrote Michael Malihi, an administrative law judge in Atlanta.

“For the purposes of this analysis, this court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”

Malihi’s decision came without any evidence being presented by Obama or his lawyer after they refused to participate in the required hearing under a state law that mandates all candidates qualify for the office they seek.

The law also allows any voter to raise a challenge, and several did. A hearing was held on their evidence on Jan. 26.

Malihi essentially tossed all of the information the plaintiffs and their attorneys presented.

“The court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations,” he said.

He was miffed at Obama but decided the case on the merits, as requested by the plaintiffs.

“Neither defendant nor his counsel, Michael Jablonski, appeared or answered. Ordinarily, the court would enter a default order against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a proceeding. … Nonetheless, despite the defendant’s failure to appear, plaintiffs asked this court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. … By deciding this matter on the merits, the court in no way condones the conduct or legal scholarship of defendant’s attorney, Mr. Jablonski,” he said.

The judge ignored plaintiffs’ urging that a request for a contempt citation be issued against Obama for refusing to appear as subpoenaed.

The decision can be reviewed by Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who earlier warned Obama and his attorney that to snub the Georgia court system would be at Obama’s “peril.”

Mark Hatfield, one of the attorneys who, along with Van Irion, focused on the issue of the definition of “natural born citizen,” said the judge ignored the issue of burden of proof.

“If Obama has the burden of proof, and failed to show up, clearly he didn’t carry the burden,” he told WND. “The judge here completely ignores that.”

He also noted it was highly unusual for a judge to reach into another state’s repository of court rulings to support his decision when the U.S. Supreme Court itself has made a determination.

He said he’s hoping the Georgia secretary of state will evaluate the issue carefully, but he’s prepared to take the dispute to the appeals level.

Another attorney, Orly Taitz, represented several plaintiffs and brought in allegations of fake Social Security numbers and alternative names.

She said Malihi “makes absolutely no sense.”

Under Georgia law, she said, it is up to a candidate to prove his eligibility.

“[Obama] proved nothing. He didn’t show up. He didn’t provide evidence,” she said.

The decision follows a hearing last week on concerns raised by citizens of Georgia under a state law that allows voters to challenge the eligibility of candidates on the state’s ballot. It is the states that run elections in the U.S., and national elections are just a compilation of the results of the 50 state elections.

The state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

Citizens raising concerns include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Orly Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.

Irion, representing David P. Weldon, had urged the court not to overlook the fact that Obama had been subpoenaed for last week’s hearing. Obama’s attorney, he pointed out, acknowledged the subpoena by asking that it be quashed. But when the judge refused his request, but told a state elections official he would not participate.

“Plaintiff Weldon moves this court to refer an order for contempt to the Superior Court for confirmation that defendant Obama is in contempt of court,” the motion says. “Grounds for this motion are that defendant Obama willfully defied this court’s order to appear and testify during this court’s hearing of January 26.”

The motion explains that when Malihi refused to quash the subpoena, Obama and his attorney, Jablonski, “requested that the Secretary of State [Brian Kemp] halt the proceedings. … The letter ended with a statement that the defendant and his attorney would suspend all further participation in the proceedings of this court pending response.”

Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”

But after Kemp confirmed later that day that the hearing would continue and said that failing to participate “would be at the defendant’s peril,” Obama and his lawyer still refused to attend.

The letter from Obama’s lawyer to the state official, “coupled with the defendant’s willful refusal to comply with an order of this court, represent a direct threat to the rule of law,” the motion says. “The … actions represent a direct threat to the entire judicial branch and the separation of powers.”

Willfully ignoring a court subpoena is “unprecedented,” Irion argued. “While past presidents have litigated against subpoenas, in every case those presidents acknowledged and respected the authority of the judicial branch. … In the instant case the defendant did not appeal to a higher court, and instead instructed the Secretary of State that he would not participate. … When the Secretary of State refused to act in an unlawful manner the defendant ignored the Secretary of State, violated an order of this court, and apparently instructed his attorney to act in a manner that violates the professional rules of conduct of this state.”

Obama’s action, he said, “amounts to no less than a declaration of total dictatorial authority. Such declaration cannot go without response from this court. Failure to respond to the defendant’s contumacious conduct would amount to an admission that this court and the judicial branch as a whole do not have the authority granted to them under articles III and IV of the Constitution.”

The controversy over Obama’s eligibility dates to before his election in 2008. Some contend he was not born in Hawaii and that the birth documentation the White House released in April is a forgery.

Others say it doesn’t matter where he was born, as his father never was a U.S. citizen.

The Constitution requires presidents to be “natural-born citizens,” and experts say that the Founders regarded it as the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

Jablonski had asked Malihi to quash the subpoena, requested by Taitz. When the judge refused, Jablonski wrote to Kemp.

The attorney told Kemp that “serious problems” had developed in the hearings “pending before the Office of State Administration Hearings.”

Jablonski said, “At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements.”

He said the judge had “exercised no control” over the proceeding.

“It threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the state and your office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the president in his capacity as a candidate,” Jablonski wrote.

Kemp said the hearing, however, was in line with Georgia law, and he would be reviewing Malihi’s recommendations in the case.

He also had a warning about the cost of not showing up for a court hearing.

“Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural-born citizen” is born of parents who were U.S. citizens at the time of the birth. The argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor vs. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.”

That case states: “The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.

“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”

If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.

“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/208543-gop-lawmaker-walked-out-of-obama-prayer-breakfast

Obama Unraveled, Unintended Consequences

thearizonasentinel — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:08:57 +0000

The Congress passed and the occupant of the White House signed the National Defense Authorization Act in to law. That Law will ultimately backfire on Barry Soetoro. Not only has he violated sections of Title 18 of the United States Code, section related to treason, he has in our view unintentionally reauthorized the military’s ability to arrest him , put him in a prison at an undisclosed location , indefinitely, and without counsel. What goes around comes around. Will Americans demand Justice, that is the question? Unless they do, we will be dealing with this issue again in the future. Will there be a Judge federal or state , that will allow these charges to be entered into his or her court?

Rumor has it that New York has just joined the gang of six. To determine the eligibility of barry soetoro/aka Barrack Obama to be on their ballot. The next 6 months will be one of America’s major historical events. What is sad is that so many elected officials and government employee’s have participated in the fraud.

There is much speculation , that there will be a major event taking place here in America later this year. My best guess is that it will happen prior to the general election. The heat under the pot of obama’s eligibility question is being turned up by Americans regardless of party affiliations. My emails have tripled and the hits have tripled if not quadrupled. I believe it will reach the boiling over point by August 2012. XXXXXXX

This is not a partisan issue, this is not a gender issue, this is not a race issue. This is a rule of law issue. Either we have rule of law in the United States or we don’t.

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C115.txt///// Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities

Obama Reid Pelosi get the hell out of America

Two Years From Now , America Will be on its way back!

thearizonasentinel — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:47:47 +0000

Obama Care Unraveled

Obamacare unravels

This week the House repealed an unsustainable entitlement called the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) program, which was created to offset the costs of Obamacare. Its repeal is a victory for those of us seeking to dismantle the fiscal quagmire of President Obama’s health care reform law.

A former director of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office called CLASS “the poster child for President Barack Obama’s health care reform: bad policy, deceptive budgeting and stealth government expansion.” The top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee called it “a ponzi scheme Bernie Madoff would be proud of.”

It is also the key policy linchpin the Obama Administration used to offset the $1 trillion price tag on Obamacare. However, the CLASS program was not an accidental miscalculation, but rather an attempt to withhold information from the American people on the full cost of the health care law.

The CLASS program was intended to be a national, voluntary insurance program for long-term care. However, the program depended on budget gimmicks to hide the actual cost: it would immediately begin collecting payments, but would not pay out benefits for five years.

As a result, in the short run, it appeared viable, accounting for $80 billion in phony savings. But in the long run, particularly as America’s population ages, the new entitlement would wreak havoc on our already broken federal budget.

What is really alarming is that the President and other proponents of Obamacare knew about the fiscal train wreck and did nothing about it. A congressional investigation found that the Administration was well aware of this budgeting trick, but ignored warnings from Health and Human Services (HHS) officials that the program was a “recipe for disaster.” Instead, the President and Congressional Democrats rushed to include it in the law to achieve its phony savings as a way to shore up support for the health care law.

Thankfully, an amendment was added to Obamacare that required the Administration to first ensure that the CLASS program would be solvent for 75 years, before HHS began implementation. Of course, that made transparency and disclosure wait until after Obamacare’s passage.

Only because of this requirement, last October, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius had to suspend the program and admit that it was insolvent. Just as suspected, there was no way to successfully implement this new entitlement in a way that was fiscally sustainable.

The CLASS program’s failure is significant for two reasons. First, the phony savings now leave an $80 billion hole in our federal budget. Second, this program reveals the budgeting gimmicks upholding the health care law.

Still, the Administration refuses to acknowledge these two facts. In fact, the President promised to veto efforts to repeal the CLASS program.

Obamacare-believers have buried their heads in the sand, but clearly, the false charade is unraveling before our very eyes. Repealing the CLASS program is one step toward undoing this atrocity.

County Sheriffs tell the feds, you have no authority in our Counties ,unless we give it to you.

thearizonasentinel — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:08:47 +0000

Wyoming Sheriffs Told Federal BATF & IRS Agents To Abide By The Constitution Or Face Immediate Arrest. UPDATED!

September 22, 2011 by Volubrjotr 60 Comments

Wyoming Sheriffs Put Feds In Their Place.

Immediately Below Is The Internet Embellishment

Followed By

How It Really Went Down!

Here’s one the mainstream media isn’t going to tell you: County sheriffs in Wyoming are demanding that federal agents actually abide by the Constitution, or face arrest. Even better, a U.S. Federal District Court agreed.

The court decision was the result of a suit against both the BATF and the IRS by Mattis and other members of the Wyoming Sheriff’s Association. The suit in the Wyoming federal court district sought restoration of the protections enshrined in the United States Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution.

VIDEO TODAY 1/26/2012 => Obama Eligibility On Trial In Georgia: Evidence For The FIRST Time Has NOW Been Entered Into Court!

November 09, 2011

Guess what? The District Court ruled in favor of the sheriffs. In fact, they stated, Wyoming is a sovereign state and the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers exceeding that of any other state or federal official.” Go back and re-read this quote.

The court confirms and asserts that “the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official.” And you thought the 10th Amendment was dead and buried — not in Wyoming, not yet.

Sheriff Dave Mattis

Bighorn County Sheriff Dave Mattis spoke at a press conference following a recent U.S. District Court decision

(Case No. 2:96-cv-099-J (2006)) and announced that all federal officials are forbidden to enter his county without his prior approval ……

“If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to leave, or retain them in custody.”

Bighorn County Sheriff Dave Mattis comments:

“If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to leave, or retain them in custody.”

“I am reacting in response to the actions of federal employees who have attempted to deprive citizens of my county of their privacy, their liberty, and their property without regard to constitutional safeguards.

I hope that more sheriffs all across America will join us in protecting their citizens from the illegal activities of the IRS, EPA, BATF, FBI, or any other federal agency that is operating outside the confines of constitutional law. Employees of the IRS and the EPA are no longer welcome in Bighorn County unless they intend to operate in conformance to constitutional law.”

The implications are huge:

But it gets even better. Since the judge stated that the sheriff “has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official,” the Wyoming sheriffs are flexing their muscles.

They are demanding access to all BATF files. Why? So as to verify that the agency is not violating provisions of Wyoming law that prohibits the registration of firearms or the keeping of a registry of firearm owners.

It appears to me that one office where the Libertarian Party should focus it’s limited resources is County Sheriff. The change that could be made is nothing to laugh at. Meanwhile, there are still a bunch of nuts wasting valuable resources supporting those that seek offices that will never be won.

by disinter

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/11/14/u-s-sheriffs-rise-up-against-federal-government-sheriff-threatens-feds-with-swat-team/

This event took place last weekend!

Obama Ballot Challenge extends to Six States more coming!!!

thearizonasentinel — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:53:44 +0000

Bin Laden Was Dead Before May 2nd 2011//http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1686/049/ExNavy_Seal_Says_Bin_Laden_Was_Dead_Before_May_2nd_2011..htm

You may have to reboot this video , they are apparently they ,someone is trying to take it down. Pay attention , and try to consider what Ron Paul is trying to tell you without coming right out with it. We’re in a serious national security crisis here. Now that Americans understand why the Seal Team 6 team was taken out. More Navy Seals will be coming forth. Even with mind altering drugs, the sub conscious mind will let the truth come to the surface.

http://youtu.be/nkIIBnIuXHM Watch this to the End, dont judge until you see it thru.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

Published: 14 mins ago

by Bob Unruh Email | Archive

Subscribe to author feed

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.

But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.

The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.

A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.

Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”

Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obama’s home political base.

There, in a complaint recently filed by Stephen F. Boulton of McCarthy Duffy LLP and Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, their client is asking for a change in state law to allow the vetting of political candidates.

Obama isn’t even mentioned by name, but don’t think for a minute that the requested change wouldn’t include his candidacy.

The plaintiff is Sharon Meroni, who long has fought inside the system for a way to challenge the candidacies there. In her new case, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, she is petitioning for a judicial review of the state’s election procedures as they exist now.

Targeted are the state Board of Elections, members of the board, several county clerks and others, including candidates Dan Duffy and Amanda Howland.

Meroni, a registered voter in the 27th Legislative District in the state, said her concern is that “only candidates qualified for office under the Illinois and United States Constitutions appear on the ballot.”

The state’s primary is in March.

The case alleges the candidates did not provide sufficient proof that they are U.S. citizens as required to hold the office being sought “as is required by the Illinois Constitution of 1970.”

State officials refused to remove the names from the ballots, so Meroni has gone to court. Granting ballot access, she said in the complaint, “is contrary to law, against the manifest weight of the evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and a denial of the rights of the petitioner.”

Kreep told WND the way the system is established in Illinois it essentially allows political parties to determine who runs for office, and unless voters find out about a filing and can assemble a formal objection within five days, their concerns are dismissed.

And the system has no procedure for verifying the eligibility of candidates, he said.

That particular issue has been in the headlines for the past four years, since before Obama’s 2008 election victory, because of the questions that remain over his eligibility. The U.S. Constitution demands a “natural born citizen” be president and the Founders probably thought that to be the offspring of two citizen parents when they wrote the term.

But Obama’s father never was a citizen. There also are those who contend he was not even born in the United States.

Kreep said the Illinois procedures make it virtually impossible for candidates to be challenged for their eligibility.

He said there likely will be raised in other states concerns similar to those in Illinois, where “barriers now in existence … bar voters from reasonable investigation of the citizenship of a candidate.”

That’s simply a deprivation of the constitutional right to due process, he said. The case seeks a declaration that the political maneuvers are unconstitutional.

There also have been assembled campaigns specifically to encourage voters to file eligibility complaints about candidates with states. One such effort is the Obama Ballot Challenge, which lists contacts for state elections offices across the country.

It is, of course, the states that actually run elections; a national election is just the compilation of the results from the 50 states.

“A candidate that is not legally qualified to be on the ballot, such as Barack Obama, steals votes from other candidates who are legally on the ballot,” the site advises.

WND previously reported that cases already have been begun in New Hampshire, where state officials rejected the claims; Alabama, Tennessee and Arizona.

The newest round of court actions do not try to have a judge determine Obama is not qualified for the Oval Office and remove him from it, they simply challenge his eligibility for the 2012 election.

Many of the cases cite Minor v. Happersett, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion from 1875 that said a “natural born citizen” would be a person whose parents both were citizens.

“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States,” said one of the filings.

It continued, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.

“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”

Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, also is working on several of the issues, and has brought the question in court in Arizona.

“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.

Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.

“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee Secretary of State. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.

He said if the cases succeed, the Democrats would not be able to list Obama as their candidate for 2012.

“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” Van Irion’s group said.

WND also has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into concerns Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012.

Other attorneys involved in the Georgia case are J. Mark Hatfield and Orly Taitz.

Hatfield has told WND that the goal is for a court determination on the definition of “natural born citizen,” which then could be applied directly to Obama’s candidacy.

The quartering of Newt Gingrich.

thearizonasentinel — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:27:12 +0000

The quartering of Newt Gingrich. The Romney Campaign aided by the GOP and the MSM should tell Americans just who the establishment/Republicrats are afraid of . Bob Dole wanted to raise taxes, Gingrich stopped him. So now Dole is coming out of his shell and naturally joining the GOP bull _ _ _ _ . Romney has no defined plans, so all he can do is hammer away at Newt. When you have no defined plan , all you can do is throw rocks at the competition. Been there done that. This you can count on. Newt will expose Romney in late February and early March. Florida has 50 delegates in play. Newt , and Ron Paul will take it to the Convention. That is when the Ron Paul supporters will rally. By the time the Convention rolls around , Romney’s left wing policies will be well established . There is no way Romney can out shout obama on obama care. Romney is a big talker when he’s by himself on stage, but standing next to Newt or Paul, he looks like somebody just put a diaper over his head. Romney like Bush/McCain, gave us Obama. Obama wants to run against Romney, even with a teleprompter, Obama will wipe the floor with Romney.

The following from a faithful.

Karen:

If you have read other e-mails that I have sent out regarding ALL OF THE CANDIDATES, YOU KNOW THAT I CANNOT, AT THIS TIME EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR ANY OF THEM. The reason being, they have not even discussed or presented their views on how they would remove Obama from the office of the Presidency. Karen, how can they all stand up there and say that they will uphold our Constitution, when nothing is discussed about the fact that Obama should not be in the White House and he certainly should not be on any state’s ballot for the Presidency.

Karen, I do believe that that their may be many reasons why they are pushing Romney…..Romney has yet to prove that he is a Natural Born Citizen….Obama not a Natural Born Citizen, so Romney not a Natural Born Citizen….Romney part of the New World Order……Romney For Obamacare! Romney Follow Soro and the New World Order. Karen, so many of our Elected Officials are within this Movement of the New World Order and the Agenda 21. I do agree with some of the Pappas’ opinions, but I just cannot respect any of them, and this deeply distresses and sadden me beyond words.

Would it not be great if one of those Patriotic Sheriffs decided to Run for the Presidency? Maybe OUR Sheriffs will accomplish the success that they are striving to for All America. Karen, Take care. God be with you.

Love,
Suzanne

My friends, what we are witnessing during this horrendous campaign season, is about as low, dirty, filled with lies and brutal as any I recall in my long lifetime. The GOP has long been known for eating their own, but this year,

they have turned the practice into an art form that threatens to implode the party. But far worse, the zealous attacks on Gingrich, all based on lies and distortions of fact, threaten to destroy the GOP’s platform AND worse, the entire campaign, giving it lock stock and barrel to Obama! The whole business is unthinkable, and outrageous, at a time when outrageous is the clarion call of the day and one can barely fathom things could get any worse. Well, not only are they getting worse, but we are shooting ourselves in the foot, over and over and over. It was proven long long ago that the so-called “establishment” of the GOP ran amuck, picked and/or supported losers, and permitted a

pathetic platform that was either weak, off point, absurd, or irrelevant. They are doing it all in spades now, having apparently lost focus on the end game – that being to defeat Obama and put to pasture his radical destruction of the U.S. I know personally too many people I regard as ‘smart’ who have bought the whole pile of CRAP that has been dished out for a long time about Romney and Gingrich – believing the attacks on the Gingrich side, while buying the bullshit about Romney as the true conservative? the shoe-in winner? Oh please – I am sick beyond words about what the GOP, the tea party, and the conservative movement has spiraled into hell. What are they thinking? Clearly they are not at all. This is not a matter of policies, ideology, issues – it is utter and total character assassination at its worst and ugliest.

The biggest question we must all ask is WHY THE HELL are those traitors to Conservatism rendering the party into demise? WHY? What truly is their agenda? If I had to guess, I’d have to say that those operating at this super base level of vitriol are operating at someone else’s behest – could it be that the GOP has already been taken over by Soros? I know he’s been working on it for some time now, but I thought he had a long way to go. It would seem perhaps he has already acquired sufficient share to control the party. Whatever it is that is going on, it is high time we all wake the “F” up, and stop this steam roller of a machine on its course to our destruction. George Soros recently made two shocking statements that people are mostly ignoring, both made in the last couple of weeks: 1) He predicts that the “occupy” movement will turn very violent in the Spring – well DUH, he should know, he funds the movement and has seen that they are trained accordingly; and 2) there is virtually no difference between Romney and Obama. BELIEVE THE MAN – he knows of what he speaks, and he has an odd, inexplicable way of sharing his ‘insider’ knowledge – almost as if he finds great pleasure in waving the red flag in front of the bull; or toying with Americans. Whatever the game he plays, we can be sure of one thing – he has NO intention of losing, no matter how much he must spend, no matter how many fences he must straddle, and he will control the outcome on both sides of the coin, thus ensuring he wins no matter what! Keep that in mind the next time you look favorably upon Romney!

Campaign Speech or State of the Union Address?

by Colonel Bob Pappas, USMC, Retired

Never in my adult life, and I’ve been around a while, have I observed the level of attacks on a candidate from one’s own Party as I observe ongoing against Newt Gingrich. People who have held my respect for years are engaging in a character assassination ritual which is every bit as despicable as their characterization of the object of their disdain. Long time admired Ann Coulter is about to have a nervous breakdown and has gone off a cliff with her angst and level of vitriol. The Drudge Report and Fox News, not to mention the “left” might just as well fly a banner of disparagement against Gingrich and endorsement of Romney. Today I read another hit piece on Gingrich by R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr., Editor in Chief and Founder of the American Spectator.

Isn’t it co-incidental that piling on occurs just as the national cameras are focused on the Florida primary? Amazing how that works! The other candidates cannot win on the merits of the strength of their positions, debating skills or accomplishments so they turn to their friends in media who are evident shills for Romney. So, like is too often the case, the others seek to win by tearing down their opponent since they are incapable of winning on the strength of their positions or arguments, on the issues. Is Romney, Paul or Santorum bad? Only to the extent that they are not up to the task of winning on the merits and all they have left is to resort to negative attacks. When Gingrich first defended himself, the shills (that would be Fox News and Drudge) immediately painted Gingrich as angry and that he was being negative. Huh? Did I miss something? Wasn’t the first barrage of negative ads put out by Romney and Paul in Iowa? Yes, I thought I remembered that correctly.

It frustrates them that Newt, despite the fact that they put him on his political deathbed shortly after announcing his candidacy, and again after Iowa continues not only strong but leading. Could any of the others survive the slings and arrows as he has? No! His campaign Staff resigned early on and reported to Perry for duty, but then Perry endorsed Newt, Humm! When he (as did “The Donald”) criticized Paul Ryan’s plan, they went loopy that he would speak the truth. They emphasize out of context distortions, like the “$1.6 million he was paid” by Fannie Mae; and that he “resigned in disgrace” with a $300K “fine” are just that, out of context, intended to mislead distortions of the facts.

His resignation from the congress according to a Washington Post was because of losses during November 1998 Congressional elections that had nothing to do with the $300K reimbursement he agreed to make. Read the account and related articles from the November 8th 1998 edition of the WP yourself, then one can make an informed decision: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/stories/gingrich110798.htm.

Establishment Republicans Party operatives such as Ann Coulter, Fox News in the person of Brit Hume and Carl Rove, and Drudge Report should carefully consider the consequences of their damning behavior toward the Party’s most likely candidate whether or not they succeed in destroying that candidacy. Nancy Reagan has bestowed the “Reagan Mantle” on Gingrich, and Michael Reagan has endorsed him…and yet Dick Morris (Fox News) quips the most laughable line of the season: “Romney is Reaganesque.” Sure, and I am George Patton or Douglas MacArthur, or both.

Was Newt perfect while he was Speaker in the way he dealt with issues? No. But, Newt Gingrich did more in four years for the American people as Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives than any, no, all his competitors combined have done in a lifetime.

Newt’s morals: So what is the issue…his distant past from which he has turned away, confessed, repented and has been happily married for twelve years? He has let the past go, but evidently a lot of good people have not. Thank the Lord for salvation from sin, and thank Him for his forgiveness, otherwise we are all “toast” and Jesus will have died in vain. But, I think not. David Hanson has an excellent piece in National Review Online, on the subject of Presidential morality.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/289250/fidelity-and-presidency-victor-davis-hanson

I am for getting rid of Obama. My analysis is spot on that Ron Paul doesn’t have a chance and he as much as says so although during the Thursday debate was more certain; Romney is a Mormon whose personal values may be okay, but intentionally pulling the plug on failing businesses, not to preserve capital but to make money is not my idea of how true capitalism is supposed to work; and, he lies and supports liars; and Santorum would be crushed by the media in the first five minutes after the nomination. At this juncture all Santorum is succeeding in doing now is to diminish the chances for conservative leadership. Coulter’s “Romney is more conservative than Gingrich,” may actually be one up to Morris’ “Reaganesque” comment in the comedy department. Romney may be better looking than Reagan and younger too, but Reaganesque? Stop it Morris, it makes my sides hurt.

That brings me back to imperfect Newt who is penitent and has matured; and who the Lord has molded into the man to best lead this nation, just as imperfect and impetuous “Peter” (Wasn’t Peter the disciple who denied knowing Jesus three times the night of Jesus’ betrayal? Yes, that Peter.) was the leader of the early “Christian” Church.

Semper Fidelis

Bob Pappas

Well said Bob and thanks.

Congress attempts to undermine Citizenship Requirement to be a President

thearizonasentinel — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:49:04 +0000

http://youtu.be/H3aCfR8rmrw

Our Right to Bear Arms, infringed in New Jersey.

thearizonasentinel — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:11:03 +0000

http://youtu.be/NeWM6w3tR9M

Arizona Senate Border Security,Federalism and State Sovereignty Chaired by State Senator Sylvia Allen

thearizonasentinel — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:23:22 +0000

Click here , it’s a long hearing but you need to listen and take notes on what we have been dealing with in Arizona and all the Western States. Ron Paul says he will eliminate the Department of Ag and Interior. It can not happen soon enough. This may not be in your back yard , but it could be. States must step up and take control of their state lands. It’s not federal land it is federal mismanaged land. The land belongs to us not these bureaucratic agencies.

http://azleg.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=13&clip_id=9817

Obama’s Worst Nightmare, Legal Immigration.

thearizonasentinel — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:28:35 +0000

The Constitution Stands in the State of Georgia,Alabama,New Hampshire,Mass, Illinois. Come on Gov. Brewer /AG.Horne get with the Constitution . Governor Falin , lets go step up!!! Remember that Oath you took? Come on Gov Perry , make some noise, how about you Gov Brownback, which side of the Constitution are you going to stand? Hey Governor Schweitzer, We need the Keystone, We know you’ve supported Obama in the past, surely you’ve figured this guy out by now!!!! To hell with the party and Pelosi, stand up for America!!!!

TO THINK IT TOOK A RUSSIAN IMMIGRANT STANDING UP FOR OUR CONSTITUTION!

WE HAVE A HERO; DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ.

MY VOTE IS THIS IS THE WOMAN OF THE YEAR

ALL NEED TO READ THIS, AS MANY APPRECIATED THE HARD WORK, BUT FOR THOSE WHO SAID, “WE WERE WASTING OUR TIME;” APOLOGY ACCEPTED!

Subject: Obama Blocked In 5 States From Primary Ballot

Obama Blocked From Registering For Alabama State Primary Until Eligibility Is Validated By Court.

UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/13/obama-blocked-from-registering-for-alabama-state-primary-until-eligibility-is-validated-by-court/

UPDATE: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATEDEMANDS PROOF POSITIVE!

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/26/video-today-obama-on-trial-in-georgia-constitutional-eligibility-hearing-in-georgia/

Susan Daniels Testifies in Atlanta: Obama’s Social Security Number is Fraudulent
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/11/affidavit-new-hampshire-citizens-defrauded-by-obama-lawmakers-require-obama-to-produce-vault-long-form-birth-certificate/

BREAKING => Two New States Massachusetts And Obama’s Very Own Illinois Challenge Barrack’s Official Ballot Eligibility.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/12/ballot-access-challenge-filed-against-obama-in-state-of-illinois/

http://iamacitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/massachusetts-and-illinois-join-georgia-concerning-obama-eligibility-to-be-president/

New Hampshire Lawmakers Require Obama To Produce Vault Long Form Birth Certificate.
http://youtu.be/BUcyb5pmUKI

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/11/affidavit-new-hampshire-citizens-defrauded-by-obama-lawmakers-require-obama-to-produce-vault-long-form-birth-certificate/

Obama Eligibility: Pelosi Supplied Altered Congressional Records To The 2008 Election Commission!

Attention Elected Officials:

So what are you, the elected officials of Our America going to do about this man, Obama who has disgraced our country once again and who has been the usurper according to the evidence that has been presented and that has been communicated to you now for years now by many True American Patriots. You have delayed much too long in meeting your responsibilities as our elected officials…..you have known all along that this man, Obama is an imposter and has the title of usurper, not the President of our great country…..this man and all of his appointees must be removed from their said positions immediately……this man, Obama must be held accountable for all of his crimes against our Constitution, our country and all your fellow Americans…..ONCE AGAIN I SAY STOP AIDING AND ABETTING THIS CRIMINAL……WHY HAVE YOU PUT YOURSELVES WITHIN THIS POSITION OF TREASON….DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE THE PEOPLE CAN REMOVE YOU FROM YOUR POSITIONS FOR YOUR ACTS OF TREASON? WE HAVE ALLOWED EXTREMELY TOO MUCH UNDERSTANDING AND PATIENCE, FOR WE HAD THOUGHT YOU WOULD COME THROUGH DISPLAYING YOUR LOYALTY AND HONOR FOR OUR COUNTRY AND YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS BY NOW…WE THOUGHT YOU HONORED YOUR POSITIONS WITHIN OUR GREAT COUNTRY, IN THE MANNER IN WHICH WE THE PEOPLE HONOR THEM, BUT SAD TO SAY, THIS HAS PROVEN NOT TO BE THE FACT..…WE ARE A GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE….WE DEMAND THAT YOU ENFORCE AND EMBRACE OUR GOVENRMENT RESPECTIING EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN AND OUR TREASURED CONSTITUTION….IF YOU CANNOT DO SO, THE RESIGN, OTHERWISE ACT AS THE RESPONSIBLE AND COURAGEOUS ELECTED OFFICIALS THAT WE HAVE EMPLOYED.

REMOVE OBAMA AND ALL OF HIS APPOINTEES NOW.

“It is impossible to rightly govern the world without The Bible.”George WashingtonT

“To Sin by Silence when They Should Protest Makes Cowards of Men. ” Abraham Lincoln

Sincerely,
Suzanne C. Short

The Arizona Sentinel

Another Dumb ass Judge, Unable to read the Constitution. However,

The fact is he was born in Kenya. Watch the video in the post below this one!!! Even his grandmother knew where he was born. And it wasnt in Hawaii. These fools in black robes, are killing this country.

CERTIFIGATE

Judge says Obama can be on Georgia ballot

Rejects plaintiffs demand to strike name from 2012 election

Obama Unraveled, Unintended Consequences

Two Years From Now , America Will be on its way back!

County Sheriffs tell the feds, you have no authority in our Counties ,unless we give it to you.

Wyoming Sheriffs Told Federal BATF & IRS Agents To Abide By The Constitution Or Face Immediate Arrest. UPDATED!

Wyoming Sheriffs Put Feds In Their Place.

November 09, 2011

Obama Ballot Challenge extends to Six States more coming!!!

Bin Laden Was Dead Before May 2nd 2011//http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1686/049/ExNavy_Seal_Says_Bin_Laden_Was_Dead_Before_May_2nd_2011..htm

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

The quartering of Newt Gingrich.

Congress attempts to undermine Citizenship Requirement to be a President

Our Right to Bear Arms, infringed in New Jersey.

Arizona Senate Border Security,Federalism and State Sovereignty Chaired by State Senator Sylvia Allen

Obama’s Worst Nightmare, Legal Immigration.

Obama Blocked From Registering For Alabama State Primary Until Eligibility Is Validated By Court.

Susan Daniels Testifies in Atlanta: Obama’s Social Security Number is Fraudulent
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/11/affidavit-new-hampshire-citizens-defrauded-by-obama-lawmakers-require-obama-to-produce-vault-long-form-birth-certificate/

New Hampshire Lawmakers Require Obama To Produce Vault Long Form Birth Certificate.
http://youtu.be/BUcyb5pmUKI

Obama Eligibility: Pelosi Supplied Altered Congressional Records To The 2008 Election Commission!

The Arizona Sentinel

Another Dumb ass Judge, Unable to read the Constitution. However,

Obama Unraveled, Unintended Consequences

Two Years From Now , America Will be on its way back!

County Sheriffs tell the feds, you have no authority in our Counties ,unless we give it to you.

Wyoming Sheriffs Told Federal BATF & IRS Agents To Abide By The Constitution Or Face Immediate Arrest. UPDATED!

Wyoming Sheriffs Put Feds In Their Place.

November 09, 2011

Obama Ballot Challenge extends to Six States more coming!!!

Bin Laden Was Dead Before May 2nd 2011//http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1686/049/ExNavy_Seal_Says_Bin_Laden_Was_Dead_Before_May_2nd_2011..htm

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

The quartering of Newt Gingrich.

Congress attempts to undermine Citizenship Requirement to be a President

Our Right to Bear Arms, infringed in New Jersey.

Arizona Senate Border Security,Federalism and State Sovereignty Chaired by State Senator Sylvia Allen

Obama’s Worst Nightmare, Legal Immigration.

Obama Blocked From Registering For Alabama State Primary Until Eligibility Is Validated By Court.

Susan Daniels Testifies in Atlanta: Obama’s Social Security Number is Fraudulent http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/11/affidavit-new-hampshire-citizens-defrauded-by-obama-lawmakers-require-obama-to-produce-vault-long-form-birth-certificate/

New Hampshire Lawmakers Require Obama To Produce Vault Long Form Birth Certificate. http://youtu.be/BUcyb5pmUKI

Obama Eligibility: Pelosi Supplied Altered Congressional Records To The 2008 Election Commission!

Susan Daniels Testifies in Atlanta: Obama’s Social Security Number is Fraudulent
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/11/affidavit-new-hampshire-citizens-defrauded-by-obama-lawmakers-require-obama-to-produce-vault-long-form-birth-certificate/

New Hampshire Lawmakers Require Obama To Produce Vault Long Form Birth Certificate.
http://youtu.be/BUcyb5pmUKI