http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/05/6-in-10-arizona-voters-support-proof-of.html

Anyone see a trend here? We no longer need the Main Street Media .!!!!!.

Judge Strikes Down NDAA, Rules Obama Must Obey Constitution

In a considerable setback for a president eager to ravage the due process rights of the American people, Federal Judge Kathleen Forrest granted a preliminary injunction on Wednesday, striking down those sections of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012 which sought to provide Barack Obama the power to indefinitely detain citizens without benefit of their 5^th Amendment rights.

Signed very quietly into law on New Year’s Eve, the controversial Act has been roundly criticized as unconstitutional by groups on both the political left and right. Of greatest concern was Section 1021, which grants the United States military authority to exercise police powers on American soil. Upon order of the president and at his sole discretion, agents of the military are empowered to detain “until the end of hostilities” anyone the president believes to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or “associated forces.”

Judge Forrest concluded that the Section “…failed to ‘pass Constitutional muster’ because its broad language could be used to quash political dissent.” In a statement clearly directed to lawmakers, she added,   ”Section 1021 tries to do too much with too little – it lacks the minimal requirements of definition and scienter that could easily have been added, or could be added, to allow it to pass constitutional muster.” That is, Congress failed—perhaps deliberately– to define “substantial support” of terrorist groups or describe those activities which might be construed as crossing the legal line. And no law may be enforced if those to whom it applies are unable to clearly understand what a violation of that law entails.

Nothing could more plainly reveal the rank corruption and lust for power of the Manchurian Candidate than his involvement in crafting and then misrepresenting the final text and authority of the NDAA. According to Democrat Senator Carl Levin, it was Obama himself who demanded American citizens be included under the detention law and that the President have exclusive authority to invoke the statute. “The language which precluded the application of Section [1021] to American citizens was in the bill that we originally approved…and the administration asked us to remove the language which says that U.S. citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section,” said Levin after the NDAA was signed into law.

Yet in his signing statement, Obama wrote that he had in fact forced Congress to “…[revise] provisions that otherwise would have jeopardized the safety, security and liberty of the American people.” So rather than the grand inquisitor, committing to prison any American citizens he chose to view as enemies, Obama claimed to be their champion and savior, protecting them from the excesses of an over-zealous Congress!

“I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens,” wrote Obama. “My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.” This of course was an outright lie, given the expressed meaning of the statute as Obama himself had demanded it be written. Leave it to Barack Obama to demand he be given absolute authority over the American public, yet claim in the next moment that he will not take advantage of it!

The Department of Justice, which defended the NDAA before Judge Forrest, will undoubtedly appeal her ruling. It is a judicial process Americans must watch closely as the free exercise of our Constitutional rights depends upon the outcome.

Before I get into this gun thing,  let me just say, there’s a lot of noise about obama and where he was born today, . What the deal Hannity, we were telling you that 3 years ago. These videos , were out there years ago.  Where have these idiots been.  Hannity said again today, he was satisfied with the BC that obama provided,,, is he suddenly going to wake up and discovered that it was layered.  Your either  a putz or dumber than a box of rocks.  Had to turn you off today, couldn’t stand any more BS.

In obama’s world he thinks he’s special sort of dictator, but in America, he puts his pants on just like the rest of us, (well maybe).  He may be special in DC but out here in America he’s just another empty suit living off the taxpayers. He’ll be gone in a few months and we’ll never give him another thought. You see he is an imposter, so nothing he’s done will stand.  Problem is  everyone in  DC are in cohoots with him.  End the FED,, Federal Government!!!!,  Bring it all back to the states and start over!!!!!!!!

This link will take you to probably one of the most important case’s to be decided relating to the 10th Amendment.  When you consider what Obama thinks he can do regarding gun control.  You’ll see how this decision would render his actions a waste of taxpayer-funded activity.

Bond V US     : http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-1227.ZO.html

Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

“The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury.  One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection.  In Great Britain the king himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court…

     “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void.  An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law.  The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”  

Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

“An unconstitutional act is not law.  It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office.  It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” 

Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.”  

16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256

“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.  The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionally dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.”

If you listened to the oral argument at the Supreme Court  debating obama care some of the above were mentioned by Paul Clement the litigator for the State of Florida.

Obama can do all he wants with treaties and agreements between the UN and the State department. But at the end of the day , its  all bull _ _ _ _! Simply because whether he or Joe or hillary like it or not , we have a Constitution.  And sooner or later a stand up federal judge like Judge Katherine Forrest comes along, he or she will explain to obama that he’s not authorized to cause injury to American Citizens outside of the Constitution.  And ultimately the Supreme Court will . Judge Forrest just yesterday, told Obama and all those idiots in the House and Senate,  that they need to sit down and read the book that they swore an oath to.

To take this one more step , to calm those that think Obama can just toss the 2nd Amendment aside. Lets look at the The Dick Act of 1903. First it can not be repealed.  Why the Nation Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America , and brother Ted don’t just hang this Act around their neck is interesting. Because this Act  combined with the current decision Bond V US , settles the question.  Every American needs to know about these decisions and acts , and let congress and this  Marxist (that’s afraid of Americans) , that they are wasting their time trying to hoodwink the American people.

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642

http://youtu.be/eMlzYFx2ZtM  // 

I have always said if someone would just check the British archives a lot would be learned about the Obama’s. http://christwire.org/2012/04/obamas-father-was-blacklisted-as-an-anti-american-anti-white-terrorist-in-1959-u-s-state-department-and-british-secret-service-documents-reveal/ Barack Obama’s controversial and legally-contested hold on the executive office just got a great deal more complicated. Documents released this week by the British Foreign Secretary reveal that the president’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, Senior, was the target of an international investigation due to his ties to Kenyan terrorists groups. The top secret files, which had been suppressed for decades, were privately condemned by administration officials who feared they would undermine the president as polls show him trailing Republican contender Mitt Romney by at least five points. They also highlight the mounting public evidence tying Barack Jr. to communist sleeper cells and long range plots to undermine American democracy. (In other disturbing Obama news, it was leaked today that the President frequenty ate dog meat as a child. He is the first and only United States President to have ever eaten a family pet. Apparently, such an act is a ritualistic part of Muslim religious training, and the young Obama found the meat, “quite satifsying.”) The shocking dossier on Obama Sr. came to light after a lengthy case in the British High Court brought by a team of professors at Oxford University. The records hark back to a time when Kenya was still a British colony and Obama Sr. was a Kenyan national who traveled to Hawaii for a college education, despite his political radicalism and poor academic record. The suspicious move prompted a closer look by security agents who worried about the young man’s sudden fixation on entering the United States. Barack Jr. hatched a very similar schemeto network his way from academia to the Halls of Congress, despite his equally mediocre educational record. On September 1, 1959, one British ambassador penned a highly classified communiqué that stated, “I have discussed with the State Department. They are as disturbed about these developments as we are. They point out that Kenya students have a bad reputation over here for falling into the wrong hands and for becoming both anti-American and anti-white.” Despite the warnings, Obama Sr. was allowed to stay in Hawaii were he met and married Stanley Ann Dunham. Sometime afterward, the couple traveled to Indonesia where the President was born and raised with a traditional Muslim upbring, complete with Imans and Madrasas. While this is not the story told by the mainstream media, far too many questions have been raised about the incredibly fraudulent birth certificate the Washington insiders tried to pass off on the public a few years back. Despite this long string of earth-shattering revelations, the U.S. State Department does not appear likely to release any FBI or CIA files they have on the President’s father. It is imagined that under Director J. Edgar Hoover, such a dangerous man would have been watched closely and the evidence against him would be exhaustive. Curiously enough, Barack Jr.’s avowed anti-white, anti-American policies appear to be a continuation of his father’s very own radical socialist ideology. Obama Sr. was an agent of the African American Students Foundation (AASF), a trade unionist agitation group which fronted for foreign socialist interests. Just like his father, Barack Jr. went from Hawaii to Harvard, with the assistance of many leftwing political organizations (such as ACORN, the Weather Underground and the Fabian Socialists). Will the mainstream media continue to hide this vital information about Obama’s presidency? Will the State Department ever release Barack Sr.’s file? By no stretch of the imagination should this man he trusted with one ounce of power, yet somehow he has schemed his way to the very top of our body politic. This is nothing less than the greatest crime America has ever known. The evidence released this week suggests that the Obama plot to undermine Christianity through socialism may indeed stretch back half a century. While this comes as a shock to many, others have been worried about the Barack Obama Jr. since his early days in the Senate. There are just too many questions swirling around this President for the U.S. public to trust him. For people of faith, it reminds us to be weary of false prophets and those who push the heinous terrorism of Islam on our homeland. The Bible warns us repeatedly about such a man who rises to power and begins a series of events prophesized as the End Times. Could Barack Obama be that cloven hoofed creature we have been warned about? Tragically, most citizens are simply too moronic to worry about this very real possibility.

=

One year ago next month I and two of my compadre’s made an attempt to bring the Goldwater institute on board with these  issues facing the Western states. They blew us off.  We were stunned. But at the end of the day , it was obvious that since our mission was not going to immediately bring cash to their coffers, they weren’t interested. Now the issue has reared its head in Tombstone Arizona and suddenly the GI has seen , in our view , cash.

Well here’s the deal. Tombstone does not need Goldwater Institute or anyone else. They have the Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, and the laws of the land.  I and several others are providing the information necessary to give the Cochise County Board of Supervisors, the City of Tombstone’s elected officials and the County Sheriff , Sheriff Larry Dever, what they need to know to sluff off the little men in green trucks.

Here’s the bottom line.  What I and others have learned over the last 10 years since the Rodeo Chediski fire is this.  These federal agencies work to intimidate the public. In fact they either don’t know the law or if they do they ignore it hoping that you and I can’t read. A prime example of this was the oral arguments recently in the Supreme Court over obamacare. The litigator for the government was so inept that even the liberal justices suggested that he try something else. Since what he was spewing wasn’t selling. Paul Clement the attorney for Florida, was brilliant knew the law, knew historical precedent and literally ran away with the show.  And the truth is , how do you defend obama care, its unconstitutional on its face. And  again during former Senator Russell Pearce interview with Shumer and Durbin, he made them look like fools time after time.  There is no doubt that both of them went out the back door to avoid answering questions from the devastated liberal press.   Well here’s the good news. Americans are waking up, they recognize the threats coming from groups like the Sierra Club, Earth First and others, thru their puppets , these agencies living inside the beltway.  More good news , the district of columbia is broke , the Corporation known as the United States is bankrupt. Guess what, America , we that is the Citizens of our sovereign states have no contract with that Corporation or any other Corporation acting as a government of the people for the people, simply stated it’s a scam. It’s a Ponzi Scheme, and what is exciting is that the Citizens of sovereign states are recognizing that fact.

Several years ago we started sending out a document, that gives folks the instructions to acquire an Allodial Title /Land Patent on their private property. In the last two years the interest in protecting private property has grown exponentially.  In fact thanks to the New London Conn, decision and this fella in the White House.  Folks are recognizing that they must get their property out of the hands of these County and State Corporations “ that they have no contract with”.

One more important development that happened on Thursday:  Murdock the fella that mopped the floor with the Indiana Rino , was on Washington Journal . He was asked about transparency in government. And out of the blue,  he stated that the Indiana CAFR, or Confidential Annual Financial Report was available on line.  So for all those doubters that these moneys are out there in state and county secret investment accounts, as Mr. Walter Burien has been trying to expose for years.  Now its out there in the public domain and we should all thank Mr. Burien for his efforts.  We are going to try to get a clip of that interview on C-Span.  I almost fell out of my chair.

The two Constitutional Conservative Candidates currently in the running for the white house have both committed to eliminating 5 plus agencies. The Department of Ag is in the top five. Ron Paul and Gary Johnson,Newt was there but he’s gone.

The following is an Analysis of the Hage V United States Case that was decided in 1998.  If your interested in property rights, you’re gonna want to read this.

Analysis of Hage v. United States
The Sierra Times ^ | 3 February, 2002 | Lyman D. Bedford, Esq

Posted on Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:16:54 AM by brityank

Analysis of Hage v. United States

Lyman D. Bedford, Esq: 02.03.02

On January 29, 2002, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith issued his final opinion and findings of fact with respect to the property rights phase of Hage v. United States, which phase was tried in Reno, Nevada in October 1998, with post-trial oral arguments occurring in San Francisco in June 1999.

At issue was the nature and scope of the Hages’ property rights on the federally managed grazing allotments appurtenant to the Hages’ Pine Creek Ranch. In his decision, Judge Smith found that the Hages owned extensive water rights on the Table Mountain, Meadow Canyon, Monitor, Ralston and McKinney Allotments, which had been grazed by the Hages’ cattle prior to 1991, when the Government put them out of business. The water rights found to be owned by the Hages amount to more than 20,000 acre feet, and are located in virtually all parts of these grazing allotments.

In addition to water rights, Judge Smith found that the Hages were the owners of ten 1866 Act ditch rights of way. Judge Smith found that the scope of these 1866 Act ditches was 50 feet on either side of the ditch, and that the Hages’ livestock had the right to use the forage adjacent to these ditch rights of way. Judge Smith also found that the Forest Service could not require the Hages to obtain a special permit in order to maintain their 1866 Act ditches. In his decision, Judge Smith noted that Congress intended to give those with 1866 Act ditches access to those ditches for construction and maintenance. Anything less might make those same ditches worthless. In holding that there is no requirement under the law to seek permission to maintain an 1866 Act ditch, Judge Smith specifically found that the Forest Service manual requiring a special permit in order to maintain such a ditch does not have the force of law and cannot alter a statutory right. This decision also rejected the contention of the Forest Service that it had authority to adjudicate title to rights of way under the 1866 Act.

In addressing the issue of the Hages’ access to their water rights, Judge Smith’s opinion stated the following:

The Government cannot deny citizens access to their vested water rights without providing a way for them to divert that water to another beneficial purpose if one exists. The Government cannot cancel a grazing permit and then prohibit the plaintiffs from accessing the water to redirect it to another place of valid beneficial use. The plaintiffs have a right to go onto the land and divert the water.

Judge Smith set a another status conference for March 13, 2002, and ordered the Hages to file a brief that addresses whether the Hages had a beneficial use for the water prior to the Government revoking their grazing permits, and that there was a taking of the Hages’ right to use their vested water rights. In this regard, Judge Smith noted that the Hages must demonstrate that they could have used the water if the Government had not deprived them of access to prevent them from using the water. He stated that the Hages have a right to the water, so long as they can put it to beneficial use.

The importance of this decision is its specific rejection of the position of the BLM and Forest Service that ranchers have no property rights on their grazing allotments. Although Judge Smith rejected the Hages’ claim that they owned the surface estate of their grazing allotments, they do have private property rights, i.e., water rights, 1866 Act ditch rights of way, the right to have their livestock consume the forage adjacent to their waters and ditches, and the right of access thereto. If the Government’s interference with these rights makes it impossible for the rancher to use them, the Government will be required to pay compensation for their loss.

In his decision, Judge Smith made it clear that the mere fact that a rancher holds a grazing permit confers no valid property interest. However, if by revoking the Hages’ grazing permits, the Forest Service and BLM prevented the Hages from accessing and using their vested water rights, then those agencies may have taken the Hages’ water rights. Those water rights are a property right, and not a license like the grazing permits. This decision will be of great help to ranchers who have vested property rights on their allotments, such as water rights and 1866 Act ditches. However, this decision will be of little or no aid to those ranchers who have no such vested property rights on the allotments their livestock graze.

Lyman D. Bedford, Esq.
McQuaid, Metzler, Bedford
& Van Zandt, LLP
221 Main Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

Permission to reprint/republish granted, as long as you include the name of our site, the author, and our URL. www.SierraTimes.com All Sierra Times news reports, and all editorials are © 2002 SierraTimes.com (unless otherwise noted)

The following illustrates why we must end the fed and return our country to a hard stable currency and do it now.  Greenspan and Bernanke have systematically printed our so-called money into worthless sheets of paper.  They have artificially destroyed the liquidity markets by forcing interest rates to zip.  We will never see this economy return to sustainable progress until the fed mandates are permanently removed. And interest rates return to free market rates.

http://finance.uncommonwisdomdaily.com/reports/event/may2012/forecasts-event.php?ccode=0510125055142LPP&em=raindanz@theriver.com&sc=FPNA&ec=5055142

We’ve added the following because we received dozens of emails yesterday  about this issue.  Here again, the Republicans have put forth a candidate with out properly vetting him.  And over looking the obvious.  The question in our minds this morning, is, are Ponzi schemes part of the free market and free enterprise system, are they the norm for capitalism? We congratulate the Ron Paul campaign for letting nature take its course here.  I suspect some of the other campaigns will be saying to themselves. “How did we miss this”? . “What were we thinking”?  Who will MSM start pushing now?? How will Hannity and Fox respond?  This issue will snowball, how will all the east coast genius talking heads , walk back on Romney.  Lets see, the $100.00 dollar gun tax, Romney care, and now this.

Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering.
http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg
Report this message as spam

=

http://wakeup-world.com/2012/05/05/landmark-lawsuit-by-us-home-owners-implicates-obama-and-big-banks-in-massive-global-laundering-scheme/

Preparing for Massive Civil War, Reeducation Camps : http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd534.htm

The question of President Obama’s draft card: Has evidence been destroyed?::http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/05/washington-times-new-obama-admin-rule.html

http://www.theconstitutionalresourcecenter.com

Governor Gary Johnson at CPAC 2011  Send your help today ,  email Gary @ email@garyjohnson2012.com

Side Bar:   Congrat to the CIA, well done. Lets terminate the so called Homeland Security, let the FBI and CIA do what they know how to do. All DHS is ,is a government employment agency.  INS, Border Patrol, FBI, CIA, these are the getter done agencies.  Thanks guys and gals  for what you do.