The Arizona Sentinel

April 11, 2014

The Truth by Sherri Bundy Cox , Mr Cliven Bundys Daughter!!! Is there a Harry Reid Connection

Governor Sandavol, Its time you removed the Blm and the forest service from the state of Nevada. These federal agencies are criminal enterprises. Lock and Load your Constitutions boys.
Required Reading. Our problem is that Americans do not understand what has been happening in the west , particularly west of the 100 meridian for over 100 years . The best way to have a solid understanding is to read the following books. Amazon has the Hage Book. When I started pushing this book the price on amazon was 10.00. The interest has exploded now its $65 but worth every penny!!! Information is priceless!
First “Storm over Range Lands” by Wayne Hage, a Nevada Rancher that lost his life fighting the federal government abuse of power. Ive met Ramona Hage Morrison , Waynes daughter and consider her a friend. And “Trouble in a green truck ” by Charlie McCarty from reserve New Mexico a rancher that worked for the forest service. Ive met Charlie . Call 1 800788 7654 or write Dorrance Publishing Co,,. Inc. 701 Smithfield ST Pittsburgh,Penn 15222 to order Charlies book, or stop by the hardware store in Reserve NM.
Also there is “Liberty and Justice for All (what a joke), by Hugh McKeen a must read. Published by Bookstand Publishing, Morgan Hill,CA 95037, you can order the book thru them.

Folks , information, the truth, is power. Tomorrow I will be headed for Clark County to support the fight against the federal government. I will be armed and loaded with my weapon, “The Constitution of the United States of America” the most powerful weapon we have!!

Now:
Mr Bundy’s daughter wrote….
From the daughter of Mr. Cliven Bundy…..the rancher in Nevada……

SHIREE BUNDY COX: I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on
this BLM fight. Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it.
There is so much to it, but here it s in a nut shell. My great grandpa
bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around
there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my
dad in 1972. These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and
also built waters, fences and roads to assure the servival of their
cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars. These rights to
the land use is called preemptive rights. Some where down the line, to
keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management.
They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their
ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to
pay the BLM wages and to help with repaires and improvements of the
ranches. My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they
were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve. Instead they
began using these money’s against the ranchers. They bought all the rest
of the ranchers in the area out with they’re own grazing fees. When they
offered to buy my dad out for a penence he said no thanks and then fired
them because they weren’t doing their job. He quit paying the BLM but,
tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down. So
my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements
with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes. In essence the BLM
was managing my dad out of business. Well when buying him out didn’t
work, they used the indangered species card. You’ve already heard about
the desert tortis. Well that didn’t work either, so then began the
threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for
all these years. Now their desperate. It’s come down to buying the brand
inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff. Everything their doing
at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the
United States of America. Now you may be saying,” how sad, but what does
this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you. They will get rid of
Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and
then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again.
Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next.
Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being
stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them, those cattle do belong to him.
Regardless where they are they are my fathers property. His herd has
been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM
even exsisted. Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove them
and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s
signature on it. They think they can take them over two boarders, which
is illegal, ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the
Richfeild Aucion and sell them. All with our tax money. They have paid
off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada
brand inspector with our tax dollars. See how slick they are?
Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”.”

From a trusted source:

“The excuse of the endangered tortoises is entirely bogus. Articles
from last August show that they were running out of funds at the
‘sanctuary’ so they were going to kill all the tortoises in their
“care”. Imagine, some of those live 100 years or more in the desert
without interference by man. And now mankind tries to “save” them and
kills them instead! The environmentalists should be going against the
BLM for that slaughter! Tortoises have nothing at all to do with
this raid on the rancher.”

“HAH! I made a comment this morning, wondering what it was they wanted
the land for. Remember the guy in Ventura County who was killed for
the bogus allegations he had MJ growing on his acreage? DEA wanted
the land!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Donald_P._Scott

Is there a link yet on Reid’s connection?” And what is Harry Reids connection: http://www.infowars.com/breaking-sen-harry-reid-behind-blm-land-grab-of-bundy-ranch/

April 6, 2014

The Elimination of Property Taxes does not require an increase in Sales Taxes.

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 8:44 pm

Bruce.. i am on the mailing list of Kelleigh Nelson.. got this from her list..
hope you dont mind if i forward this emaikl to her..

Rich
—– Original Message —–
From: Arizonasentinel@aol.com
To: ricseib@comcast.net
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Eliminate Property Taxes for higher Sales Tax – Not Necessary!!!!!!!!!!!

No one should be paying property taxes. As a candidate for Governor of Arizona I vowed to eliminate property taxes in Arizona. And there is no reason to raise sales taxes. All states and counties have CAFR accounts, hidden from taxpayers. We should not be renting our homes and property from the teachers unions.

In addition in Arizona and I suggest the other states as well, there has never been any legislation authorizing the counties to send tax bills unsigned /to property owners.

We have no contract with the Corporate County Governments to send them levis on our property. See attachment.

There is a ranch somewhere in Texas that has an allodial title and is not on the tax rolls. Not aware of its location.

Public education is a joke at best. If counties and states want to fund public education and these so called units of higher learning, let the counties pay for them out of existing revenues. We do not need to be funding new buildings with pictures on the walls, new trucks and cars for employees, healthcare certainly isnt needed now with the ACA, :) Retirements, and the list goes on. I and millions like me are sick of civil service being a gold mine to retirement.
I retired almost twenty years ago , because I was sick and tired of sending money to the same people that were making my personal and professonal life miserable. Screw em, End Property Taxes NOW. Demand that your property be removed from the tax rolls. File claims on their bonds, sue the bastards.

You may forward the attached doc as you wish. There is no constitutional justification for property taxes,.

Bruce

In a message dated 4/4/2014 6:50:52 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, ricseib@comcast.net writes:
Scroll down for Pat’s comments, then read the story

THANKS TO PAT HUFF WE HAVE FIRST INKLING OF COLLAPSE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION:

HERE WE GO DISMANTLING OUR EDUCATION FUNDING SYSTEM!

ENTER STATE FUNDING OF INDIVIDUAL CHILD – IEPs – (TAXFUNDED SCHOOL CHOICE/CHARTERS FOR WORKFORCE TRAINING)

“Glenn Hegar promised to eliminate the property tax.”
Mike Collier on Tuesday, March 18th, 2014 in a campaign email blast

Comptroller candidate Glenn Hegar favors ending property taxes, didn’t promise he’d do it
False
Share this story:

State Sen. Glenn Hegar, running for comptroller, talks about getting rid of property taxes at the Jan. 6, 2014, meeting of Longview tea party group We the People.
The Democratic nominee for Texas comptroller says the Republican nominee, state Sen. Glenn Hegar of Katy, made a taxing promise.

Mike Collier of Houston said in a March 18, 2014, email blast, “Glenn Hegar promised to eliminate the property tax,” a step Collier said would trigger the state’s “most outrageous tax increase” ever.

Hegar’s alternative to the property tax, Collier wrote, would require sales taxes “to be at least 20 percent — and possibly as high as 25 percent” to pay for local needs such as “schools and county roads … water and sewage treatment” and more.

For this article, we’re setting aside what happens should property taxes go away.

But did Hegar promise to kill property taxes?

Broadly, no single official including the comptroller can abolish property taxes, which are levied by cities, counties, school districts and other taxing units. Abolition would take legislation passed into law and maybe a voter-adopted amendment to the Texas Constitution.

Republicans including Debra Medina and Raul Torres, among comptroller candidates defeated by Hegar in the 2014 primary, have voiced support for getting rid of property taxes; Medina pitched replacing property taxes with expanded sales taxes as far back as her 2010 gubernatorial bid.

In fact, the Texas GOP party platform, adopted at the party’s 2012 convention, says, “We encourage abolishing property taxes (and) shifting the tax burden to a consumption-based tax,” as Dale Craymer, president of the business-oriented Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, noted in an email exchange with us.

As we embarked on this fact check, we noticed Hegar’s campaign website doesn’t discuss property taxes. We also asked for an interview with Hegar about any promise to wipe out property taxes; campaign manager David White told us by email that Hegar wasn’t available on the couple days we inquired. White also said he was unaware of Hegar directly promising to eliminate property taxes.

White emailed us an excerpt from Hegar’s Dec. 31, 2013, response to a questionnaire from the Dallas Morning News in which Hegar referred to “an antiquated system of property tax collection. While I prefer a shift to more of a consumption-based tax system, (I) know that we are many years away from being able to implement such.”

Collier spokesman Jason Stanford, asked for evidence of such a Hegar promise, emailed us Hegar’s Jan. 20, 2014, answers to a Collin County Conservatives questionnaire and a Feb. 5, 2014, Killeen Daily Herald/Temple Daily Telegram news story on GOP comptroller candidates’ Feb. 4, 2014, debate in Salado.

Neither showed Hegar promising to abolish property taxes, but both described his support for gradually reaching that goal. “I support a shift from the property tax toward a consumption tax system. I believe a consumption tax is the fairest, most transparent tax system,” Hegar wrote in the questionnaire. (Consumption taxes are those levied when a person spends money on a product or service.) According to the news story on the Salado debate, Hegar, Medina and Torres all “said they were in favor of completely phasing out property taxes.”

Stanford also pointed us to a video clip the Collier campaign posted online, which it also began using in a video ad that debuted April 1, that comes from the Jan. 6, 2014, meeting of a Longview tea party group.

Collier’s website links to a longer video recording of the event, posted to YouTube by the Longview group. Here’s our transcript of two property-tax answers from Hegar, bolding the words Collier included in his video ad:

Audience member: I would just like to know your thoughts on ending the property tax and replacing it with something along the lines of a consumption tax or something, so we can finally own our property?

Hegar: That — well, you took the words with your last statement: so you can own your property. Because you really don’t. The government owns it. The question is how much do you pay rent. I tell you, I don’t like the property tax, never have. I think we should replace it. The best thing to replace it with is a consumption-type tax, sales tax per se. I was up — I was talking to somebody the other day about it, and the question is, is what would that number be. Oh, I know what it was: I got it on a questionnaire, one of the tea party groups. And they said, ‘Well, what steps do you take?’ and I said, ‘Steps? You just do it.’

That’s the only way you get there. You know, I know the votes have not been in the Legislature a few sessions ago in order to try to get rid of it. But the fact is as comptroller, I have said numerous times — or, running as — that is the only fair way. Because the question is, who pays? Everybody pays. And you actually, when you buy that loaf of bread or whatever be it, you pay the tax and guess what? You get to walk away with the bread. You don’t have to bring the last four loaves back. And that’s kind of what it is with your property. …

Different audience member: … There’s a lot of people my age that aren’t going to own property any time soon, so what kind of — what do you have to say to them? That they have to pay, we have to pay higher taxes on the things we consume? But we don’t own property.

Hegar: Well to me, it’s still a fairness, I mean you’re, you’re here in Texas and so the fact is is you pay sales tax today. You pay a portion of the tax. But you may not pay all of it, and so should we favor one set of folks because they may not own property versus other people? No, the fact is, is the landowners, if you look at local property, as in a school district, they’re paying half of it. Well, why shouldn’t it be distributed among everybody and not just based only on the landowners? And you treat all landowners the same; you don’t pick and choose winners and losers. (Applause.) I mean I — I just think — and the reason I said earlier is, you know, business, people, you fill in, Texans should succeed on their own merits and you shouldn’t be picking winners and losers, and that winners and losers, if that means that younger people because they don’t own their home, then that puts a greater burden on them, and compare the current system, maybe it does, but it’s fair. That’d be my personal opinion.

Stanford told us that by using the phrase “Just do it,” Hegar “may not have said the words ‘I promise,’ but he explained how he would” eliminate property taxes.

Another tea party video the Collier campaign is publicizing shows Hegar both describing obstacles and spelling out the role he would take. Collier says on his website the video shows Hegar proposing a sales tax rate of up to 18.5 percent to cover cuts in property taxes.

In the full interview, posted online Dec. 31, 2013, by the Montgomery County Tea Party, Hegar said that in replacing the property tax with a sales tax, “the hardest question to answer for the Legislature that puts it into place, No. 1, is obviously getting the votes to do it.” After that, “then the biggest question is, is that one (tax) that you broaden the base, as in what is taxable for consumption, or is it the rate? And that’s where the numbers get really hard,” he said. “Maybe you’ve heard wild percentages.”

Starting with the existing state sales tax of 6.25 percent plus local sales tax of up to 2 percent, Hegar said, “does that go up 3 percent, 18 percent? Up to 18.5 percent, some numbers have been out. But the question is how wide and how broad is that. And that’s where the Legislature has seemed to get caught up.”

Asked how the comptroller could influence legislators, Hegar told the tea-party group, “I think the comptroller’s role should use more of what’s called a dynamic fiscal note,” a type of report that he said can be used to show the opportunities presented by a tax cut, such as eliminating property taxes, rather than only presenting its negative effect on state revenues. The note is “something that I would definitely utilize,” he said.

Our ruling

Collier said, “Glenn Hegar promised to eliminate the property tax.”

Hegar has said that as comptroller, he would “definitely” use a dynamic fiscal note to encourage the policy change, but he also has spoken about the difficulties of reaching an approach that wins legislative favor. We rate Collier’s statement as False.

ADVERTISEMENT

About this statement:
Published: Thursday, April 3rd, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

Subjects: State Budget, State Finances, Taxes

Sources:

Mike Collier email blast, March 18, 2014

Email interview, excerpted, with David White, campaign manager, Glenn Hegar campaign, March 21-31, 2014

Email interview, excerpted, with Dale Craymer, president, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, March 27, 2014

Email interview, excerpted, with Jason Stanford, spokesman, Collier campaign, March 21-28, 2014

Hegar answers to Collin County Conservatives questionnaire, Jan. 20, 2014

Killeen Daily Herald/Temple Daily Telegram FME News Service news story, “GOP comptroller candidates want to end property tax,” Feb. 5, 2014

Telephone interview with Alex Wukman, reporter, FME News Service, March 21, 2014

T-SPAN video of GOP comptroller candidates debate, Salado, Feb. 4, 2014

Collier campaign video, “Glenn Hegar calls for sales tax to replace property tax,” March 19, 2014

Collier campaign video ad, April 1, 2014

Video of Hegar speaking to We the People, Longview, Jan. 6, 2014

Hegar interview video, “Glenn Hager Part 1 of 2 by Montgomery County Tea Party, Texas,” Dec. 31, 2013

Written by: Sue Owen
Researched by: Sue Owen
Edited by: W. Gardner Selby

How to contact us:
We want to hear your suggestions and comments. Email the Texas Truth-O-Meter with feedback and with claims you’d like to see checked. If you send us a comment, we’ll assume you don’t mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.

Browse The Texas Truth-O-Meter:
See all Pants on Fire rulings
See all False rulings
See Rick Perry’s file
See John Cornyn’s file
See Lloyd Doggett’s file
See all Truth-O-Meter rulings from the state capitol
Subscribe:
Keep up to date with Politifact Texas:
Via a widget for your site
Via RSS
On Twitter
On Facebook
In the Austin American-Statesman
Politifact
© 2014 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
About PolitiFact | Contact Us | Advertise
Privacy Policy | Terms, Conditions & Copyright

FROM PAT HUFF

Well, Charlotte, remember from my talk at the conference when I mentioned vouchers to be introduced through removal of the property tax for a higher sales tax? It’s being introduced by a Republican candidate for Comptroller. He won the primary and now will face off against the Democrat candidate in November. We are seeing television adds about it now. He wants to abolish the property tax under the guise of “you should be able to truly own your property”. Not a word about how this will kill school districts, plus take away their taxing authority which is one of the principal ways to fight the voucher program. Dan Patrick the Republican front runner for Lt. Governor and an avid proponent of vouchers and school choice, is in favor of the increased sales tax for elimination of property taxes, as well. Such deception….

Pat

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2014/apr/03/mike-collier/comptroller-candidate-glenn-hegar-favors-ending-pr/

April 5, 2014

Teds, Danger of the Single Story

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 2:31 pm

Getting to the heart of the problem, Congress and its entire membership!!

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 12:59 pm

And the really SAD PART OF ALL OF THIS IS THAT, these taxes were ALWAYS ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL….Americans were convinced ‘it was their duty’ to pay to these THUGS !!!

PROPAGANDA AT IT’S BEST !!!!!!!

Date: Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Fwd: Ya think she’s ticked
To: battleacre@gmail.com

My Comments:

    Have you ever wondered why these clowns in Washington are always beating the “Small Business Owner” drum. Its really simple, the revenue that funds all these give away programs,wars,retirements,government vehicles,health care, trips abroad, Air Force One, and the entire aviation fleet of the government, military retirements, and health care and the over 1000 bureaucracies and agencies that do nothing to promote prosperity for the public is “The Small Business Owner”. When the Small business’s of America decide that they have had enough. I did in 96, my brother is quiting and closing his business this year. The Corporation of the United States and all State and County Corporate Government will collaps. The sooner the better.
    OSHA cost a contractor in Phoenix last week $40,000. Those fines fund the very agency that charged them.
    We are a stupid country, but millions are waking up to the fraud of Corporate Governments.

Alan Simpson, the Senator from Wyoming calls senior citizens the
Greediest Generation as he compared “Social Security” to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats .

Here’s a response in a letter from PATTY MYERS in Montana … I think
she is a little ticked off! She also tells it like it is!

“Hey Alan, let’s get a few things straight!!!

1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole
(tit) for FIFTY YEARS

2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS
(since I was 15 years old. I am now 63).

3. My Social Security payments, and those of millions of
other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest
bearing account for decades until you political pukes
decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of
zero losers in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system
and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would
make Bernie Madoff proud.

4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and
“your ilk” pulled the proverbial football away
from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and
moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age 67.
NOW, you and your “shill commission” ar e proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.

5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into
Medicare from Day One, and now “you morons”
propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because
“you idiots” mismanaged other parts of the economy
to such an extent that you need to steal our money from
Medicare to pay the bills.

6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying
income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to
increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you
“incompetent bastards” spent our money so
profligately that you just kept on spending even after you
ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers
and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.

To add insult to injury, you label us “greedy” for
calling “bullshit” to your incompetence.

Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for You!

1. How much money have you earned from the American
taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?

2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political
career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement
benefits from the American taxpayers?

3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health
insurance?

4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are
you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal,
or as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political
cronies?

It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the “greedy” ones. It is you and your fellow nutcase thieves who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers.

And for what? Votes and your job and retirement security at our expense, you lunk-headed, leech.

That’s right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic, political
careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.

And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a bitch.

P.S. And stop calling Social Security benefits “entitlements”. WHAT AN INSULT!!!!

I have been paying in to the SS system for 45 years
“It’s my money”-give it back to me the way the
system was designed and stop patting yourself on the back
like you are being generous by doling out these monthly
checks .

EVERYONE!! If you agree with what a Montana citizen, Patty Myers, says, please PASS IT ON!!!!

Impeachment is moving forward.

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 11:16 am

http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/impeachment-push-revs-up-for-fight/

WND
whistleblower /WND Weekly
Trial/Monthly/ANNUAL
Customer Service

Saturday, April 05, 2014
Login |
Create An Account

Frontpage Politics
U.S.
World
Faith
Health
Education

WND TV

Opinion

Money

Diversions

Superstore

WND Exclusive: Obama ‘destroying morality’ with transgender agenda

WND EXCLUSIVE

Impeachment push revs up for fight

‘Obama and his collaborators must be made an example of for future generations’
Published: 15 hours ago
Drew ZahnAbout | Email | Archive

Drew Zahn is a WND news editor who cut his journalist teeth as a member of the award-winning staff of Leadership, Christianity Today’s professional journal for church leaders. A former pastor, he is the editor of seven books, including Movie-Based Illustrations for Preaching & Teaching, which sparked his ongoing love affair with film and his weekly WND column, “Popcorn and a (world)view.”

Subscribe to feed

Text smaller
Text bigger

759

The mainstream media may have pushed issues like impeachment and Barack Obama’s eligibility for the presidency off the newsstand, but they can’t push it off America’s highways and byways.

An organization called Overpasses for America (formerly known as Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment) is gearing up to take the message afresh to America’s motorists.

As WND reported, Overpasses for America raised a ruckus in October when they teamed up with truckers to roar into Washington, D.C., protesting what they describe as extra-constitutional actions of Congress and the president.

The group, founded in June 2013, is known for standing on highway overpasses across the country with signs openly calling for the removal of Obama from the White House for many reasons, among them his ineligibility for office, crimes committed during his tenure in the White House and multiple violations of the Constitution.

Read the details of Obama’s actions and how they don’t align with the Constitution, in “Impeachable Offenses,” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.

On March 28-29, Overpasses for America once again took to the overpasses and street corners of America for their 11th national protest, dubbed “Spring Break Out.”

Overpass protesters in Oklahoma City, March 28-29

Encouraged by successful rallies in Oklahoma, Florida and more, Overpasses for America is planning another wave of motorway protests on April 19, 2014, and pledge many more nationwide events throughout the year.

Protesters at the rallies typically carry signs and banners reminding America of Obama’s allegedly faked birth certificate, compounded by alleged impeachable offenses like the Benghazi scandal, the deaths of Navy SEALs in the Extortion 17 downing, the unconstitutional provisions of Obamacare, voter fraud and much more.

“The need for Obama’s removal from office extends well beyond his criminal actions,” the group asserted in a statement. “Obama and his collaborators must be made an example of for future generations of Americans and as a warning to future politicians that the American people are awake and are none too pleased with politics as usual across the nation.”

Please upgrade your browser to view HTML 5 content

In addition to the 12th annual demonstration planned for April 19, Overpasses for America has announced it is teaming up with Operation American Spring, a Washington, D.C., event that begins on May 16. Organizers for the event plan to demand Obama and many members of Congress step down from their positions as the first step of returning to a Constitution-based government in our nation’s capital.

Overpasses for America isn’t the only major voice calling for impeachment of President Obama.

As WND reported, radio and TV host Glenn Beck has made similar demands, and WND has compiled a list of several members of Congress who have talked about impeachment as well.

Among those on the list are Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa; and Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla.

WND also has reported Watergate investigator Bob Woodward of the Washington Post compares Obama to Richard Nixon. And there’s a national petition that calls on Congress to immediately investigate the “unconstitutional and impeachable offenses” of Obama.

Sign the petition right away!

The petition encouraging Obama’s removal from office states: “Therefore, we the undersigned urge Congress to immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the many blatantly unconstitutional actions of Barack Obama. For members of Congress, each of whom has also sworn a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution, to allow a president to routinely flout the Supreme Law of the land without being held accountable is equally repugnant to a free country and a free press.”

Tens of thousands already are on board with the effort, which is just the latest in a long string of calls for impeachment or an investigation.

Please upgrade your browser to view HTML 5 content

Impeachment also has been brought up by several WND columnists.

Nat Hentoff wrote that Obama, “since taking office, has continually limited the First Amendment, the most singular and powerful right that distinctly identifies Americans from residents in all other countries on Earth.”

Columnist Burt Prelutsky took it further.

“I want Obama to go through the process because he has it coming. In totalitarian states, after all, the people have no other recourse except to take to the streets and spill blood. But we have available the process of impeachment, and Obama should be forced to defend his contemptible lies and actions,” he wrote. “If for no other reason than his unbearable arrogance, the schmuck should have to pay a penalty. For instance, when a White House reporter asked him to justify spying on the Associated Press, Obama said, ‘I’ve still got 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and I still have a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.’ No, sir, the United States has 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.”
A panel of top constitutional experts convened by WND blasted Obama’s actions in office. Bruce Fein, the legal scholar who is best known for having drafted articles of impeachment against former President Clinton for perjury after he lied under oath, said Obama’s orders to drone-kill a terror suspect were “tantamount to murder.”

“You can’t have democracy and the rule of law if you never get to know what the facts are and you just have to accept what the government says they are. If you don’t have a trial, that’s the definition of tyranny.”

Louis Fisher, a scholar in residence at the Constitution Project, said of Obama’s appointment of “czars”: “That is a big deal. A lot of people say, ‘Well, that’s been going on a long time.’ In our form of government, citizens vote for representatives and representatives pass laws. You have people heading departments, and they’re confirmed. There’s an understanding that we will call you up whenever we need to. … Congress passed legislation saying there’d be no funds for three czars, and they were named in the bill. Obama signed it into the law, but in the signing statement, he said that’s unconstitutional because he has the ‘prerogative’ to get the advice he needs to implement statutes. Well, c’mon Obama. You don’t have a prerogative to bring into the White House anybody you want at any salary. It’s all done by law. It goes back to 1978 where Congress passed legislation saying you have this number of people and these are their salaries and Congress can increase or decrease that at any time.”

And Herbert Titus, counsel to the law firm William J. Olson who previously taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools, said Obama’s military actions in Libya are a strong argument for impeachment.

“That’s the one that stands out. It’s unprecedented. It doesn’t even fit within any of the precedents that have been set since Korea.”

Obama should have seen such a move coming. A poll earlier last year found half of Americans saying he should be impeached.

“It may be early in the process for members of Congress to start planning for impeachment of Barack Obama, but the American public is building a serious appetite for it,” said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, which did the telephone poll.

On the issue of the Benghazi scandal, in which four Americans were killed after terror threats were ignored, 50.1 percent of Americans said Obama should be impeached. That included 27.6 percent of the responding Democrats.

All of America is buzzing about impeaching Obama. Now you can order Aaron Klein’s latest blockbuster, “Impeachable Offenses: The Case for removing Barack Obama from Office.”

On the IRS harassment of conservative and Christian organizations? Forty-nine percent said they agree that impeachment is appropriate, including 24.4 percent of the Democrats.

And on the fishing trip the Obama administration took into AP reporters’ telephone records in search of a security breach that may have been done by his own administration, 48.6 percent said impeachment is appropriate. That included 26.1 percent of the Democrats.

Former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan wrote that the country is in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.

“The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous” she said. “No one likes what they’re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration’s credibility deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don’t look jerky now, they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.

Noonan said Obama, “as usual, acts as if all of this is totally unconnected to him.”

“He’s shocked, it’s unacceptable, he’ll get to the bottom of it. He read about it in the papers, just like you. But he is not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his administration. Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the Justice Department,” she continued. “A president sets a mood, a tone. He establishes an atmosphere. If he is arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he is too partisan, too disrespecting of political adversaries, that spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves and then blame it on the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency across town.”

It’s even being compared to Watergate, the break-in that ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon. That was the assessment of no less than Woodward, whose reporting on Watergate eventually snared the sitting president.

Woodward said recently: “If you read through all these emails, you see that everyone in the government is saying, ‘Oh, let’s not tell the public that terrorists were involved, people connected to al Qaeda. Let’s not tell the public that there were warnings.’ And I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, ‘Oh, let’s not tell this, let’s not show this.’ I would not dismiss Benghazi. It’s a very serious issue.”

Additionally, radio host Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and one-time presidential candidate, predicted Obama won’t serve out his second term because of his complicity in a cover-up over Benghazi.

Others who have raised the subject include rock legend and gun-rights defender Ted Nugent, who said there’s “no question” Obama should be impeached.

He blasted “the criminality of this government, the unprecedented abuse of power, corruption, fraud and deceit by the Chicago gangster-scammer-ACORN-in-chief.”

“It’s so diabolical,” he said.

Please upgrade your browser to view HTML 5 content

Even Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin called for the impeachment of Obama over his policy of permitting drone strikes on American citizens overseas who are members of terrorist organizations.

On WABC Radio’s “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” Benjamin affirmed she believes the drone warfare is an impeachable offense.

See Dennis Kucinich advocate for impeachment over Libya:

Please upgrade your browser to view HTML 5 content

WND also compiled a special report on the various offenses Obama is blamed for committing and reported what experts on the Constitution believe should be happening.

See detailed results of the recent survey questions:

The administration of Democrat Barack Obama has still not satisfied congressional and media questions about just what it knew and when it knew it about the terrorist attack on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, last September 11. That attack killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya. The Obama administration has changed its explanation of that attack several times since and has so far refused to identify those officials who made key decisions not to send help to stop the attacks, and who decided not to initially call the killings a terrorist attack. Knowing that and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the Internal Revenue Service, under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama, has purposely targeted conservative and Christian groups for harassment over their tax exempt status while giving liberal nonprofit groups little or no scrutiny. Further, the IRS apparently leaked private tax information from these conservative groups to opposing liberal groups who were able to use that confidential information for political advantage. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the U.S. Department of Justice under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama secretly obtained confidential telephone records of many reporters of the Associated Press in Washington, D.C. Attorney General Eric Holder has said his department obtained the phone records without the permission or knowledge of the Associated Press in order to find who in the federal government was leaking information about terrorist plots against America. AP officials have strongly protested this invasion of their privacy but the administration stands by its actions. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

Sign the petition right away!

Text smaller
Text bigger

759

Follow WND On

Facebook:

Twitter:

Contribute
Contact Us
Send a Link
Send Corrections
Send a Tip
Send Photos/Videos
Send comments

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.

WND Related Stories

Oliver North: ‘Any other president would be impeached’

Steven Seagal talks Obama impeachment

Black pastors want Eric Holder impeached

El Rushbo: Obama descending into ‘Stalinism’

‘You can’t impeach 1st black president,’ or can you?

Push to impeach Obama makes major gain

Republican: Obama should be hanged

Liberal icon urges Obama impeachment

TODAY! Gen. Vallely offers way to save nation

Napolitano: Few checks on Obama’s bully-pulpit power

General cements plan to end Obama’s reign

Dems’ ‘don’t impeach Obama’ email backfires

U.S. politicians urged: Just quit now!

Only Nixon’s approval lower than Obama’s

General: Americans must confront Obama’s tyranny

Congressman rips Obama for acting like tyrant

‘Rise of uber-presidency’ draws impeachment talk

Another call to impeach Obama

Truckers roar to D.C. with impeachment movement

Glenn Beck: Impeach Obama and GOP stars

Napolitano: Obama will bomb Syria

Movement to impeach Obama snowballing

Black Republicans call for Obama impeachment

Congressman: We could impeach Obama

New movement ignites to impeach Obama

Obama’s archenemy: ‘We can’t impeach Obama’

Half of America wants Obama impeached

WND Exclusive Commentary

BETWEEN THE LINES

Joseph Farah

The choice of movies this weekend

LAW OF THE LAND

Star Parker

Fewer limits on campaign cash strengthens America

PULLING NO PUNCHES

Matt Barber

Gun-free zones and progressives’ insanity

FAILED FAITHFULNESS

Craige McMillan

Is this what the end of Christian culture looks like?

Real America

Patrice Lewis

The spoiled brats are back
More Commentary »

Deal of the Day

‘Impeachable Offenses’ blockbuster – $4.95 today only!

Radical $23 discount on brand-new ‘Case for Removing Barack Obama from Office’

sections WND TV
Commentary
Politics
U.S.
World
Faith
Health
Education
Money
Diversions

features Cartoons
Reviews
Daily Blessing
Email to the Editor
Forums
Petitions
Joke of the Day

resources About WND
Advertising
Commentator Lineup
Donate to WND
News Alerts
G2 Bulletin
Red Alert
WND Superstore
WND Books
Whistleblower

WND Weekly Who Reads Us
Who’s Who at WND
WND History
WND Scoops
Mobile WND

Contact WND
•Advertising Inquiries
•Corrections
•Email to the Editor
•News Tips
•Testimonials
•Questions

© Copyright 1997-2014. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.Terms of UsePrivacy Policy

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/impeachment-push-revs-up-for-fight/#o351rj1u6tZfSjJY.99

March 29, 2014

Is Cancer going to be a thing of the past???

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 10:20 am

FYI :

Avemar: Fermented Wheat Germ Kills All Types of Cancer Cells FAST

by Christina Sarich
March 22nd, 2014
Updated 03/22/2014 at 1:10 pm

One incredible, natural product kills seemingly ALL kinds of cancer, and has been subjected to numerous scientific studies to prove its efficacy.

A non-toxic, fermented wheat germ has been shown to halt aberrations in cells – that which makes ‘good’ cells turn into cancerous ones. Every healthy cell has the potential to either block, interfere or promote enzymatic activity, which can then turn healthy cells into tumorous cells. Fermented wheat germ (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) made by a standardized, patented process, and named Avemar, specifically inhibits interference in enzymatic activity so that regular cellular respiration (including glucose metabolism) can occur among only healthy cells.

While chemo and radiation kill healthy cells along with cancerous ones, fermented wheat germ only targets cancerous cells. Avemar not only halts cancerous cell growth, but also boosts the immune system in general. Fermented wheat germ has been shown to halt ovarian cancer, skin cancers, prostate cancer, stomach cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, and more. It has cytotoxic effects on almost every type of cancer cell. In fact, it had an 85% effective rate at reducing cancerous tumors in one study.

“Avemar (MSC) is a nontoxic fermented wheat germ extract demonstrated to significantly improve the survival rate in patients suffering from various malignancies. We investigated its effects in human HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells. After 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, Avemar inhibited the growth of HL-60 cells with IC50 values of 400, 190, and 160 microg/ml, respectively. Incubation with MSC caused dose-dependent induction of apoptosis in up to 85% of tumor cells. In addition, Avemar attenuated the progression from G2-M to G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle and was also found to significantly reduce the in situ activity of ribonucleotide reductase, the key enzyme of de novo DNA synthesis. We conclude that Avemar exerts a number of beneficial effects which could support conventional chemotherapy of human malignancies.”
.
The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center says that fermented wheat germ extract (WGE) is not only anti-cancerous, but immune-boosting, as well as helpful in treating diabetes, obesity, and improves heart health. This natural supplement can be taken before, after, and during chemo and radiation treatments to make them more effective, but why not just ditch chemo and radiation altogether and use one of the numerous other natural methods to clear the body of cancerous cells:

Little Known Chinese Herb & Iron Kill 98% of Cancer Cells in 16 Hours

Grapeseed Extract Better than Chemo at Halting Advanced Cancer

Assaulting Cancer: 5 Natural Ways to Boost Natural Killer Cells

Other Popular Stories:
1.Study: Apple Extract Kills Cancer Cells, Outperforms Common Chemo Drugs
2.Ginger Root Kills Ovarian & Prostate Cancer Cells Better than Chemo
3.Compound in Broccoli Kills Leukemia Cancer Cells, Leaves Healthy Cells Unaffected
4.Study Finds Blueberry Compound to Kill Cancer Cells, Blasts Cancer Radiation Treatment
5.100′s of Studies Prove this One Plant Compound Kills Cancer, Protects Against Radiation
6.Little Known Chinese Herb & Iron Kill 98% of Cancer Cells in 16 Hours

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/avemar-fermented-wheat-germ-kills-types-cancer-cells-fast/#ixzz2xMhbhoB2

Additional info:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermented_wheat_germ_extract
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook

March 28, 2014

Finally Good News, Our FBI, nailed it!!! Good Job! Now finish the job with Harry Reid!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 6:34 pm

A wave of corruption arrests and investigations is roiling Democratic politicians, posing a potential image problem in an election year.

The latest were a pair of arrests earlier this week, snagging Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon, who later resigned, and California state Sen. Leland Yee. The latter involved a tangled web of allegations including claims that the gun control-pushing lawmaker tried to connect an undercover agent with an international arms dealer.

So far, these cases are confined to the state and local levels, so it remains to be seen whether Democrats running in the congressional midterms will be tarnished.

In fact, the only major arrest of a U.S. congressman since the beginning of 2013 was that of a Republican, Florida Rep. Trey Radel, who was convicted for cocaine possession and resigned early this year. Each party typically is careful to throw stones when the other side finds itself on the wrong side of the law, because corruption and other misbehavior is a bipartisan problem.

For every Anthony Weiner, there’s a Mark Foley.

But since Radel’s October arrest, the bulk of the corruption cases have involved Democrats.

In California alone, Yee’s case marked the third arrest or conviction in as many months of a state Democratic official.

State Republicans, who have been struggling to regain their political footing, have sought to capitalize on the wave of criminal charges as a way to undo Democrats’ dominance in the Legislature. Republicans have repeatedly tried to expel Sen. Rod Wright after he was convicted of perjury and voter fraud in January for lying about his legal residence in Los Angeles County. Democratic leaders have blocked those efforts. The state Senate, though, voted Friday to suspend all three of the lawmakers in trouble.

The other, Sen. Ron Calderon, was indicted on federal corruption charges in February. Prosecutors say Calderon accepted about $100,000 for himself and family members in exchange for promoting legislation to expand Hollywood tax credits and protect the interest of a hospital that benefited from a provision of the workers’ compensation law.

Then came Yee, whose alleged activities were more befitting Hollywood than his San Francisco district.

The criminal complaint contained dramatic details about Yee’s alleged efforts to connect an undercover agent with a firearms dealer.

“Do I think we can make some money? I think we can make some money,” the senator allegedly said in one of the meetings.

The cases, while involving local politicians, have put powerful Democrats in an awkward position.

U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein of California joined a growing list of officials on Thursday in distancing themselves by demanding Yee’s resignation. The Democratic leader of the state Senate, President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, warned Yee to resign or face suspension by his colleagues, saying “he cannot come back.”

Cannon, meanwhile, was ensnared in an FBI sting and faces federal corruption charges alleging he accepted more than $48,000 in cash, airline tickets, a hotel room and a luxury apartment from undercover agents posing as real estate developers and investors. Cannon, while not a household Democratic name, led the city that hosted the Democratic National Convention in 2012.

On top of that case, Rhode Island House Speaker Gordon Fox said Saturday he was resigning from leadership and would not run for re-election, a day after federal and state authorities raided his Statehouse office and home as part of a criminal investigation that they would not detail.

The Friday raids were carried out by the U.S. attorney’s office, FBI, IRS and state police. Boxes of evidence were carried off after agents spent hours at both his home and office. Officials will not say whom or what they are investigating.

The 52-year-old Providence Democrat, who became the nation’s first openly gay House speaker in 2010, said he planned to serve out the remainder of his term through the end of the year, but that “my personal focus going forward will be on my family and dealing with the investigation.”

Meanwhile, in the shadow of the U.S. Capitol, the mayor of the District of Columbia, a Democrat, is facing his own problems. A U.S. attorney claimed earlier this month that Mayor Vincent Gray knew about an illegal, $668,000 “shadow campaign” that helped propel him into office four years ago. Despite denials from the mayor, who has not been accused of a crime, the revelation further damaged him ahead of next week’s primary.

“I think the question politically is whether it becomes emblematic of the national party,” said Mary Katharine Ham, a Fox News contributor. “And that, to some extent, depends on media coverage. In, for instance, 2006, there was the drumbeat against Republicans was this culture of corruption; and that, to a large extent, was effective because it was so consistently covered

March 25, 2014

Incorporated Municipalities all across the country are broke, bankrupt, the solution is simple!

Filed under: My Posts — Tags: , , , , — thearizonasentinel @ 11:14 am

Three Huge Cities Next In Line For Bankruptcy

By Karen Riccio on 03/03/2014 3:33 pm in Featured, Market Commentary / 6 comments

Detroit’s looming bankruptcy is making news again, this time focusing on current restructuring plans aimed to wipe out $18 billion in debt by axing pension checks of city retirees, including police and fire.

Massive long-term retirement and healthcare promises were by no means solely responsible for the city’s fall, but these massive pensions coupled with a tax base weakened by high unemployment and housing vacancies caused the budget to bleed out quicker.

The Michigan city may be the most recent victim of bankruptcy, but many of the 61 largest U.S. cities have adopted the same retirement legacy leading to $118 billion in unfunded healthcare debts. Retired city workers stop contributing to the system; the system keeps paying them; and before you know, a fiscal crisis has begun.

If you think the three cities below are too big to fail, think again.

The solid performance in the stock market in 2013 may have allowed some of their investments within pensions to grow and cover costs. However, when the growth rate of investments slow, and the payout rate speeds up, expect to see any one of these cities next in line at bankruptcy court:

Rescue Your Retirement! Quick Video reveals 3 Step “Blueprint” To A $1,000,000 Portfolio. Get The Blueprint Here.

Keep reading: Click here:: 1 2 3 4
xt In Line For Bankruptcy

50 Million Americans think they own their homes, NOT!

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 10:57 am

The American Dream is a lie,scam,fraud.

50 Million Tenants Think They Own Their Homes!
Click Here

There are nearly 50 million Americans that owe an average of $174,000!

Why is it that borrowers pay taxes on property owned by the banks?

Why are your required to insure the property that is owned by the banks?

There are 50 million debtors that think they are homeowners!

Visit The Constitution Club at: http://constitutionclub.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

To control which emails you receive on The Constitution Club, click here

March 23, 2014

Incorporated City Gov stupidity,sanctioned by a corrupt SC, and we are supposed to be a free country! B S!! Which proves my point, “Do you own it or are you renting it! You own nothing, and We preach to Putin!!

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 10:21 am

Seized property sits vacant nine years after landmark Kelo eminent domain case

kelo_home

The controversial Supreme Court ruling that expanded eminent domain to give government the right to take private property to allow economic development may have been all for nothing, according to a report.

Nine years after the high court sided with a Connecticut municipality in Kelo v. City of New London, a ruling Associate Justice Antonin Scalia has likened to the court’s disastrous Dred Scott decision, the 90-acre plot once earmarked for office buildings, luxury apartments and a new marina, remains vacant.

The controversial Supreme Court ruling that expanded eminent domain to give government the right to take private property to allow economic development may have been all for nothing, according to a report.

Nine years after the high court sided with a Connecticut municipality in Kelo v. City of New London, a ruling Associate Justice Antonin Scalia has likened to the court’s disastrous Dred Scott decision, the 90-acre plot once earmarked for office buildings, luxury apartments and a new marina, remains vacant.

Seven residents who fought all the way to the Supreme Court to keep their working-class homes in the city’s Fort Trumbull section have only their memories and whatever remains of the money they were forced to accept.

“See that pole with the transformer hanging from it?” Michael Cristofaro, a 52-year-old computer network engineer, told The Weekly Standard, which recently visited the town. “That was where my family’s home was.”

In the landmark 5-4 ruling, named for the lead plaintiff, a nurse named Susette Kelo, the Supreme Court upheld a state Supreme Court ruling that the city of 27,000 and a nonprofit entity called the New London Development Corp. were entitled to seize those properties in the name of economic development. Previously, eminent domain had been seen as limited to cases involving projects deemed as benefiting the public, but not a private economic interest.

“The nationwide outrage that followed in the wake of the Kelo decision spanned from left to right and back again on the political spectrum,” The Weekly Standard noted. “It didn’t help that one of the chief beneficiaries of the NLDC’s economic development plan would have been the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Inc., which New London had lured into the city via an 80-percent, 10-year property-tax abatement for a $300 million research facility — an expansion of the company’s research operations in Groton, Conn., across the Thames.”

More than 40 state legislatures would later pass laws banning or restricting the use of eminent domain for economic rejuvenation, particularly if homeowners would be displaced. And at least seven states amended their constitutions to ban the use of eminent domain for economic development, with some state courts explicitly rejecting the Kelo ruling as precedent, The Weekly Standard reports.

So how does New London, specifically Fort Trumbull, look now?

“The homeowners were dispossessed for nothing,” wrote The Boston Globe’s Jeff Jacoby. “Fort Trumbull was never redeveloped. Pfizer itself bailed out of New London in 2009. The Kelo decision was a disaster, as even the city’s present political leaders acknowledge.”

Associate Justices John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy formed the narrow majority in the landmark Supreme Court decision, with its conservative bloc dissenting.

“Today, the Court abandons [the Fifth Amendment’s] long-held, basic limitation on government power,” now-retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her dissenting opinion. “Under the banner of economic development, all private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded, i.e. given to an owner who will use it in a way that the legislature deems more beneficial to the public — in the process.”

The story of New London is akin to a Greek tragedy, according to The Weekly Standard, or perhaps “Eminent disaster,” as the Globe’s opinion headline reads.

“The founders put the takings clause in the Bill of Rights for a reason,” Jacoby wrote. “The desolation that is Fort Trumbull is a grim reminder that where property rights aren’t secure, neither is freedom — and without freedom, there is nothing the government can’t destroy.”

Seven residents who fought all the way to the Supreme Court to keep their working-class homes in the city’s Fort Trumbull section have only their memories and whatever remains of the money they were forced to accept.

“See that pole with the transformer hanging from it?” Michael Cristofaro, a 52-year-old computer network engineer, told The Weekly Standard, which recently visited the town. “That was where my family’s home was.”

In the landmark 5-4 ruling, named for the lead plaintiff, a nurse named Susette Kelo, the Supreme Court upheld a state Supreme Court ruling that the city of 27,000 and a nonprofit entity called the New London Development Corp. were entitled to seize those properties in the name of economic development. Previously, eminent domain had been seen as limited to cases involving projects deemed as benefiting the public, but not a private economic interest.

“The nationwide outrage that followed in the wake of the Kelo decision spanned from left to right and back again on the political spectrum,” The Weekly Standard noted. “It didn’t help that one of the chief beneficiaries of the NLDC’s economic development plan would have been the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Inc., which New London had lured into the city via an 80-percent, 10-year property-tax abatement for a $300 million research facility — an expansion of the company’s research operations in Groton, Conn., across the Thames.”

More than 40 state legislatures would later pass laws banning or restricting the use of eminent domain for economic rejuvenation, particularly if homeowners would be displaced. And at least seven states amended their constitutions to ban the use of eminent domain for economic development, with some state courts explicitly rejecting the Kelo ruling as precedent, The Weekly Standard reports.

So how does New London, specifically Fort Trumbull, look now?

“The homeowners were dispossessed for nothing,” wrote The Boston Globe’s Jeff Jacoby. “Fort Trumbull was never redeveloped. Pfizer itself bailed out of New London in 2009. The Kelo decision was a disaster, as even the city’s present political leaders acknowledge.”

Associate Justices John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy formed the narrow majority in the landmark Supreme Court decision, with its conservative bloc dissenting.

“Today, the Court abandons [the Fifth Amendment’s] long-held, basic limitation on government power,” now-retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in her dissenting opinion. “Under the banner of economic development, all private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded, i.e. given to an owner who will use it in a way that the legislature deems more beneficial to the public — in the process.”

The story of New London is akin to a Greek tragedy, according to The Weekly Standard, or perhaps “Eminent disaster,” as the Globe’s opinion headline reads.

“The founders put the takings clause in the Bill of Rights for a reason,” Jacoby wrote. “The desolation that is Fort Trumbull is a grim reminder that where property rights aren’t secure, neither is freedom — and without freedom, there is nothing the government can’t destroy.”

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

The WordPress Classic Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Scanned Retina Resource

http://scannedretina.com/

Border and National Security, Private Property rights, Removing Federal agencies from the states,American Energy Policy, Constitutional Conservative

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers