The Arizona Sentinel

July 6, 2011

U. S. District Court Subpoenas Hawaii Health Dept, Produce the Birth Certificate

 

 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR

by Sharon Rondeau

The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii issued and served a subpoena on July 5, 2011 to the director of the Hawaii Health Department for Obama’s original birth certificate

(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”

original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.

The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.

The designated place of production is noted as:

Health Department
State of HI
1250 Punchbowl str. room 325
Honolulu, HI 96813

Above the date, the following text appears:

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.

The subpoena is signed by a deputy clerk as evidenced by an underline appearing beneath that term under the signature line. It is dated “0705.2011″ just above the signature.

A second page titled “Proof of Service” reads:

This subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) Loretta Fuddy
was received by me on (date) 0705.2011

A box is checked and the following preprinted text states:

I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

and the lines are completed with the following:

by certified mail return receipt sent to Attorney General of HI, 485 South King str, room 200, Honolulu, HI 96813 on (date) 07.05.2011; or

The checkbox and line below are blank.

Zeroes appearing on lines with dollar signs indicate that there are no fees charged for the service.

A final statement reads:

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date: 07.05.2011

The server’s signature appears in cursive writing and is printed on the line below. It is stamped with the following below the process server’s signature and printed name:

Law Offices of Orly Taitz, Esq.
29639 Santa Margarita Pkwy. Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Proof of Service of the Subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Hawaii to the Health Department Director and the Hawaii Attorney General
Envelope in which Dr. Orly Taitz received a copy of the subpoena and its second page, which is the Proof of Service document

Loretta Fuddy and Dr. Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, had previously refused Taitz’s request to release Obama’s original birth certificate, citing concerns for “privacy.” Taitz responded to Onaka’s refusal with a letter copied to several congressmen, putative Attorney General Eric Holder, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, and the statement:

…we have an individual with a forged birth certificate and an invalid Social Security number usurping the position of the US president and Commander in Chief of the whole US military. Your and Ms. Fuddy’s refusal to provide access to the original birth certificate can be viewed as aiding and abetting to uttering of a forged document and elections fraud. Based on all of the above, I am respectfully requesting an administrative review of my appeal and granting access to the original document in question. If the appeal is not granted within 30 days, I will be taking further action.

On April 27, 2011, the White House released what it claimed was a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate on television and the internet. However, numerous document examiners, typesetting experts, and graphics consultants have come forward to state in formal presentations and reports that the image presented to the public is a poor forgery.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

July 4, 2011

Writ of Mandamus Filed Against Obama in Florida

Writ of Mandamus Filed Against Obama in Florida

WILL HE NOW HAVE “STANDING?”

by Sharon Rondeau


Are the scales of justice beginning to tip towards requiring Obama to prove his eligibility or leave office?

(Jul. 3, 2011) — On June 20, 2011, a Writ of Mandamus was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Barack Hussein Obama by William Spencer Connerat III. The civil action states that a previous “Admission of Ineligibility” provides proof that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to serve as president and requests that “Respondent…disprove such Official Record.”

Connerat had previously filed a “Tacit Admission of Ineligibility” in Pinellas County, FL in March 2010, claiming that Obama’s non-response was “the basis for an action of treason.”

Eligibility criteria for the president and commander-in-chief are stated in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Recently a U.S. senator suggested that an illegal alien could become president “some day.”

Connerat had filed a request in December 2008 with the Florida Supreme Court to stop the Electoral College from voting because of unresolved questions about the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II to serve as President of the United States. The case was dismissed and the Electoral College vote proceeded.

On July 1, 2009, Connerat opened a Small Claims case which included the Admission of Ineligibility and charged Obama with “tortious negligence.” It was ultimately dismissed in April 2010 without a disposition on Obama’s eligibility.

Permission had been granted by Judge Henry Hudson for Connerat to file a “Friend of the Court” brief in the case of Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, the first lawsuit filed against the Department of Health and Human Services regarding the PPACA, or health care bill, signed by Obama on March 23, 2010. Connerat has maintained that Obama was not eligible to sign the bill, as his refusal to respond to Connerat’s request for proof was admission that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen.” Connerat’s accusation of treason against Obama has been joined by others, including a typesetting specialist who claims that Obama’s “long-form birth certificate” released to the public on April 27, 2011 is a poor forgery.

Connerat was not allowed to file anything additional in the health care lawsuit.

The Post & Email asked Connerat why he thinks that Obama is ineligible, and his response was, “It is not a question of thought; it is a question of fact. He admitted it, yet did not state why. We must take him at his word, regarding the confession which was filed in Connerat v. Obama II, as well as in this case. To better answer your question, I think he is ineligible because he admitted such ineligibility, in a court of law. This is documentary evidence. The usurper needs to set the Record straight, or the Court can order him to stop his ‘posing.’”

Recently a U.S. Supreme Court ruling held that an individual has the right to challenge federal law which deprives the states or individuals of their Tenth Amendment rights under the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. Connerat has spent money in requesting that Obama prove his eligibility.

We asked Connerat if anyone helped him to prepare the Writ of Mandamus, to which he replied, “My father’s a retired attorney, so he helped me with some concepts and protocol (too many rules!), but I wrote the words.”

There are no other plaintiffs. Connerat stated that “The action signifies that I (we) have a chance for the Court to show its authority and magnificence, once again.”


© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

To visit the original posting of this article go here >>>  The Post & Email

Theme: WordPress Classic. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.