February 28, 2013
July 4, 2012
Name of the Organization: Constitutional Oversight Posse (COP)
Mission: To hold to account any representative or senator, executive branch officer, or federal judge who violates the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.Philosophy:The United States is not governed by elected officials. It is governed by a document—a document called the Constitution. Unlike humans, the document is fair and impartial. The document acknowledges and protects the natural freedoms, rights, and property of all of the people, contrary to the selfish interests of career politicians and their cronies.The Constitution overrides the dictates of government officials. It carries the will of the people who ratified it. It may be changed by the amendment process only. It may not be changed by twisted interpretations of its words, by errant precedents set by disobedient judges, or by the pressure of a mob-rule majority.As the Declaration of Independence points out, it is the duty of the people to correct a government that persistently violates its charter. The government over the last century has demonstrated its inability to restrain itself from violating the Constitution. The government has been indulging in the exercise of powers that would never have been ratified by the prescribed amendment process. Congress, the Executive Branch, and the Supreme Court have all been complicit. To rectify this problem, the Constitutional Oversight Posse has been instituted by citizens of the United States to enforce the Constitution and to ensure that any government official so presumptuous as to try to override the will of the people who ratified the Constitution and its amendments shall be duly brought to justice.The Means to the End:http://www.constitutionaloversightposse.org/The COP will grow its membership until it has at least one million signed members who are eligible to vote in the United States. Membership will be contingent on members being in full agreement with the written mission, philosophy, and means of the COP. Any member misrepresenting the organization’s charter may be expelled from the organization.Once the required membership level has been reached, the COP’s governing board will generate an initial list of violators: government officials who have violated or ignored the oath of office or who have participated in unconstitutional exercises of power. The board will then identify the representatives and senators who are legally responsible for initiating the impeachment and/or expulsion of the violators. The board will present to the identified officials an ultimatum and the list of violators who must be prosecuted. The ultimatum will set deadlines by which the prosecutorial duties must be performed. The ultimatum will inform the identified officials that failure to carry out these duties within the set time limits will render the identified officials subject to arrest for violation of their oaths of office, a high crime under the Constitution.
If an arrest is warranted, the COP will seek to have a state government authority conduct the arrest, establish bail, and set a trial date. If no state government authority will carry out this responsibility, the COP will seek to have a local government authority conduct the arrest and the follow-through. If no local government authority will commit to this responsibility, the COP will conduct a citizen’s arrest. In the event that a citizen’s arrest must be conducted, the COP will first identify a legal body within a state or local government to whom to immediately present the arrested official for prosecution. This legal body will be held accountable by the COP for performing due diligence and follow-up appropriate for a case involving high crime.
No arrest will be conducted without the participation, at the site of the arrest, of at least ten-thousand members of the COP and the assent of at least a majority of the remaining members of the COP. No assault and no physical restraint may be used on the arrested official. No armaments may be illegally employed in the arrest. Any restraints on an arrested official’s mobility will be within the limitations of the first-amendment right to assemble and within the customary guidelines for citizen’s arrests of persons displaying criminal behavior.
The COP’s operations will be conducted openly with maximum access by the news media. Publicity will be sought for the sake of educating the public concerning the Supreme Law of the Land—the Constitution—and the importance of enforcing this governing document against the self-serving interests of all government officials who would violate it.
The COP’s founders will appoint a governing board for the COP and will generate and codify the means by which a new governing board may be elected by the membership on an annual basis.
The governing board will set additional bylaws and policies of the COP in writing and will plan and coordinate the execution of COP activities. Only activities pre-approved by the governing board may be conducted under the auspices of the COP.
Only COP members may be members of the governing board.
The first major action of the COP after the membership surpasses one million people will likely be the issuance of an ultimatum to the Speaker of the House warning him that he will be subject to arrest unless he initiates within one month the impeachment and/or other legal proceedings required to remove from office Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama in a manner that will result, to the maximal extent, in the negation of the unconstitutional actions they have taken while in office. The COP will then use its threat of arrest to hand-hold each and every one of the representatives and senators through the most expeditious constitutionally-allowed process leading to expulsion of the accused.
The COP will thereafter continue to act as enforcer of the Constitution, managing the expulsion of one violator of the Constitution after another, thereby chastening an otherwise errant government and restoring the Constitution as the legitimate ruler of the United States.
Given the large backlog of violators of the oath and of the Constitution, the COP is likely to be a very busy organization. It will be a very productive organization, as well, because for every official arrested or expelled from the government there will be at least ten who will thereafter be careful not to cross the line.
Written by Ed Stoneham in collaboration with fellow 2012 Executive Board Members: http://www.constitutionaloversightposse.org/
Deb Beatty, Marcia Woods, and Kristy LonestarEd Stoneham was a guest on Blog Talk Radio on Friday, May 25th, 7 pm Eastern time. Archives are available at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/reactionariez/2012/05/25/fast-and-furious-friday
Some sites featuring the COP plan:
Citizens for Constitutional Governance: http://citizensfcg.com/styled/index.html
The Patriot Army of America: http://tpaoa.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/obama-is-guilty-of-treason/ Patriots, it’s vital that we get the amount of names signed up so that our voices will be heard. Please join us and spread the word far and wide. Feel free to re-post or re-blog the COP proposal as written above and share with all. This is a grassroots effort and we can’t do it without you. Our most important mission right now is getting names on our list, and and if you would like to be involved more, please let us know. Thank you, and God bless America. We the People will not go quietly into the night.
If you would like to become a member of COP, please fill out the contact form below and be sure to include the state you live in. Thank you, and we welcome your participation.
March 20, 2012
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Iconic public interest attorney Larry E. Klayman is jumping into the long simmering Obama eligibility battle and will represent clients in Florida and other states to challenge Obama’s inclusion on the ballot
Klayman, the Founder of Judicial Watch judicialwatch.org and Freedom Watch freedomwatchusa.org (he is taking cases privately), is the only one to ever successfully sue a sitting President (Clinton). He worked on the Gore v Bush 2000 Florida election lawsuit and knows his way around relevant Florida laws and jurisdictions.
He also represents Jerome Corsi, of “Swiftboat Veterans Against John Kerry” fame, in an action against Esquire Magazine for its alleged attempt to sabotage sales of Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” book, released in 2011. Klayman also obtained a court order to force Obama to comply with FOIA requirements in disclosing info about Obamacare planning meetings regarding Supreme Court Justice, former Obama Solicitor-General Elena Kagan.
Larry’s entre into the Obama eligibility lawsuit arena was facilitated by the Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 (OSBC) (obamaballotchallenge.com) organization. The group’s Communications Director, George Miller, said it was necessary to bring in a heavy hitter who knows how to force governments to be accountable. Sam Sewell is the group’s Florida Project Manager and OSBC Director Pamela Barnett is the California Project Manager.
Sewell stated “An analysis of several national polls on the subject of AKA Barack Obama’s eligibility shows that about half the citizens in American are unsure or don’t believe that he is eligible to be President. It makes sense that Obama supporters would want the issue settled along with everyone else. I would conclude that those opposed to releasing all of Obama’s history are frightened of the truth, just like AKA Barack Obama.”
Klayman, who took the case in his private capacity, started by representing current plaintiff Mike Voeltz, amending and pursuing his existing complaint. “Mr. Voeltz exhaustively researched FL statutes and assembled a good complaint. We fine-tuned some of the arguments, developed legal strategies and also introduced more aspects of Obama document/identity fraud into the case. Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s report and previous investigators will help significantly. Settled natural born Citizenship law was already incorporated.”
Barnett disclosed that ConstitutionActionFund.org, Inc. is their resource to help finance ballot challenges in Florida, California and possibly more in the future in other states. This legal strategy to keep Obama out of the White House in 2013 depends upon contributions from citizens who believe that Obama is not a legal President under the Constitutional requirement to be a NATURAL Born Citizen and that he should not fraudulently appear on state ballots again in 2012. Per the ongoing Arpaio investigation in AZ, the birth certificate “Obama” claims to have showing his birth in Hawaii is likely fraudulent.
Dozens of federal and state eligibility cases were dismissed for various “standing” and jurisdiction technicalities after the election in 2008. More recently, several state ballot challenges have been initially dismissed, due to invalid vetting interpretations and misapplication of precedent law by the judiciary.
Asked whether he has the goods on Obama, Klayman exclaimed, “Of course! Others have already gathered what we need, with more in the pipeline. The task at hand is to compel court proof, official acknowledgment and removal from the ballot, as well as present the damning facts about Obama to the court of public opinion.” Asked what he’ll do to help succeed, he stated: “accurate reading of applicable law, attention to rules of evidence, researching case law, venue selection and use of ‘political theater’ out of court.” Case: Voeltz v. Obama, et. al. (Case No.: 2012CA00467) and is filed in Leon County Superior Court.
Contact: OSBC Director: Pamela Barnett: 805-807-5119, firstname.lastname@example.org
February 24, 2012
April 27, 2011
SheriffGlennPalmer (the letter in pdf format which is posted below):
“Under Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution, the federal government is limited in its powers and authority. Your jurisdiction as I see it is limited in nature to the Federal Building in John Day.”