Brewer takes first step in removal of redistricting commissioners
By Jeremy Duda – jeremy.duda@azcapitoltimes.com
Published: October 26, 2011 at 4:44 pm
Gov. Jan Brewer. (Photo by Evan Wyloge/Arizona Capitol Times)
Gov. Jan Brewer demanded answers from the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission about a handful of alleged improprieties, the first step in the process for forcibly removing one or more of the commissioners.
Brewer on Wednesday sent a letter to all five commissioners seeking a response to allegations that the IRC violated open meeting laws, public records laws and the constitutionally mandated criteria for redistricting. The letter comes as lawmakers, conservative activists and others have been clamoring for a special session of the Legislature to remove IRC Chairwoman Colleen Mathis, whom many Republicans accused of colluding with the commission’s two Democrats.
The governor accused the commissioners of “substantial neglect of duty and gross misconduct in office,” repeating verbatim the provision in the Arizona Constitution that outlines how a commissioner can be removed from office. The removal of a commissioner requires the approval of the governor and two-thirds of the Senate.
“I am duty bound to ensure that Arizona’s redistricting process is constitutionally sound and worthy of the full faith and confidence of Arizona voters,” Brewer wrote. “The IRC has violated constitutional requirements.”
In her letter, Brewer cited a section of the constitution requiring the governor to serve written notice to any commissioner before the removal process can be initiated. She demanded responses from the commissioners by Oct. 31, though the Arizona Constitution does not stipulate a timeframe.
Brewer requested responses to a number of complaints, including allegations that:
• Commissioners had private conversations with each other to pre-arrange votes to award a contract to Strategic Telemetry, a mapping consulting firm with significant ties to Democratic candidates and causes.
• Commissioners had conversations with each other about awarding a perfect score to Strategic Telemetry to improve its evaluation for the IRC’s procurement process.
• Commissioners refused to cooperate with an investigation by Attorney General Tom Horne in to alleged open meeting violations.
• The IRC abandoned the “grid map” it is required to start the redistricting process with and unconstitutionally used competitiveness as the primary factor in drawing a congressional district based in Tempe and central Phoenix.
• The commission violated constitutional requirements on compactness and the use of visible geographic features when it drew two proposed rural congressional districts.
• Commissioners hired multiple attorneys to represent them individually in Horne’s investigation without the legal authority to do so.
“I believe good-faith answers can cast much needed light upon the actions of the IRC. This is your opportunity respond to the issues raised above and to the following list of IRC actions contributing to substantial neglect of duty and gross misconduct in office,” Brewer wrote.










