And while you’re at it. Send it to your County Sheriff, your state’s Attorney General, and Governor, your Federal District Judges, they were former lawyers you know , probably never read the Constitution in Law School. And not likely they know much about case history where the 2nd Amendment is concerned.
Before I get into this gun thing, let me just say, there’s a lot of noise about obama and where he was born today, . What the deal Hannity, we were telling you that 3 years ago. These videos , were out there years ago. Where have these idiots been. Hannity said again today, he was satisfied with the BC that obama provided,,, is he suddenly going to wake up and discovered that it was layered. Your either a putz or dumber than a box of rocks. Had to turn you off today, couldn’t stand any more BS.
In obama’s world he thinks he’s special sort of dictator, but in America, he puts his pants on just like the rest of us, (well maybe). He may be special in DC but out here in America he’s just another empty suit living off the taxpayers. He’ll be gone in a few months and we’ll never give him another thought. You see he is an imposter, so nothing he’s done will stand. Problem is everyone in DC are in cohoots with him. End the FED,, Federal Government!!!!, Bring it all back to the states and start over!!!!!!!!
This link will take you to probably one of the most important case’s to be decided relating to the 10th Amendment. When you consider what Obama thinks he can do regarding gun control. You’ll see how this decision would render his actions a waste of taxpayer-funded activity.
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
“The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain the king himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court…
“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”
Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionally dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.”
If you listened to the oral argument at the Supreme Court debating obama care some of the above were mentioned by Paul Clement the litigator for the State of Florida.
Obama can do all he wants with treaties and agreements between the UN and the State department. But at the end of the day , its all bull _ _ _ _! Simply because whether he or Joe or hillary like it or not , we have a Constitution. And sooner or later a stand up federal judge like Judge Katherine Forrest comes along, he or she will explain to obama that he’s not authorized to cause injury to American Citizens outside of the Constitution. And ultimately the Supreme Court will . Judge Forrest just yesterday, told Obama and all those idiots in the House and Senate, that they need to sit down and read the book that they swore an oath to.
To take this one more step , to calm those that think Obama can just toss the 2nd Amendment aside. Lets look at the The Dick Act of 1903. First it can not be repealed. Why the Nation Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America , and brother Ted don’t just hang this Act around their neck is interesting. Because this Act combined with the current decision Bond V US , settles the question. Every American needs to know about these decisions and acts , and let congress and this Marxist (that’s afraid of Americans) , that they are wasting their time trying to hoodwink the American people.
Bond v. United States
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|09-1227||3d Cir.||Feb 22, 2011
|Jun 16, 2011||9-0||Kennedy||OT 2010|
Holding: A criminal defendant who is indicted on charges that she violated a federal statute has standing to challenge the validity of the statute on the ground that it infringes on the powers reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded to Third Circuit, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy on June 16, 2011. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Breyer.
- This week at the Court in Plain English
- Opinion analysis: States’ rights ruling, a big deal or not?
- Argument recap: Benefiting from confusion
- Argument preview: A domestic dispute, gone global
- Counsel named for Bond case (UPDATED)
- Court to rule on child interviews
Briefs and Documents
- Brief for Petitioner Carol Anne Bond
- Brief for the United States in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the Amicus Curiae Court Appointed to Defend the Judgment
- Reply Brief of Petitioner Carol Anne Bond
- Reply Brief for the United States Supporting Petitioner
- Brief for the States of Alabama, Colorado, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and the CATO Institute in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Inc., and the Conservative Legal Defense and Educational Fund in Support of Petitioner (revised)
- Brief for the Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense in Support of Petitioner